<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: The $25 might be the easy part...</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36687/The-25-might-be-the-easy-part/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post The $25 might be the easy part...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:52:35 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:52:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: The $25 might be the easy part...</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36687/The-25-might-be-the-easy-part</link>	
		<description>What is involved in, or how would you write, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/premar/marone.htm&quot;&gt;a letter of reference stating the applicant&apos;s high standard of character&lt;/a&gt;&quot;?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.36687</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:38:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NotMyselfRightNow</dc:creator>
		
			<category>reference</category>
		
			<category>character</category>
		
			<category>MA</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: crush-onastick</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36687/The-25-might-be-the-easy-part#568795</link>	
		<description>i&apos;ve had to write these sorts of letters for my students sometimes. generally, i tell a specific story about how the person conducted herself through an ethical dilemma (fortunately, this comes up periodically in academic and legal settings) or how that person particularly responded to a specific capital-D duty.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
if i don&apos;t have that sort of biographical detail to draw on, the other option is a discussion of the usual civic indicators of good character: no difficulties with the law, strong affiliation with a religious institution, demonstrated dedication to volunteer work, never late in debt repayment. just stuff that says &quot;i was in a position of authority over this applicant and she was clear, tidy, respectable and trustworthy to the extent that i saw.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.36687-568795</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:52:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crush-onastick</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: unSane</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36687/The-25-might-be-the-easy-part#568802</link>	
		<description>You write a letter stating &apos;The applicant has a high standard of character&apos;. Not being funny. Explain what this means to avoid it only having one sentence. &quot;In my dealings with him/her I have found him/her truthful at all times, reliable, professionally ethical etc etc etc.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The answer is in the question.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.36687-568802</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:56:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unSane</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: JMOZ</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36687/The-25-might-be-the-easy-part#568805</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m going to agree with unSane- for this type of thing, it sounds like it&apos;s a binary check (someone other than the people getting married wrote a letter of recommendation that basically says the person has a high standard of character). I can&apos;t imagine they&apos;re going to judge the merit of the letter for this type of thing.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
crush-onastick&apos;s advice is good for a more serious letter, such as an employer or something where the content of the letter is likely to be considered.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.36687-568805</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:04:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JMOZ</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rxrfrx</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36687/The-25-might-be-the-easy-part#568832</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m sorry to not answer your question directly, but you should know that this process is totally unnecessary in MA.  You can go to a website like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ulc.org/?destination=ordination&quot;&gt;The Universal Life Church&lt;/a&gt;, become a member of the clergy in a matter of minutes (and for no money), and be thus qualified to solemnize a marriage in MA.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.36687-568832</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:26:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rxrfrx</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: brain_drain</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36687/The-25-might-be-the-easy-part#568838</link>	
		<description>unSane&apos;s approach is sufficient in most contexts.  If you want to be extra careful, you might call the number listed on the webpage to verify that this is all you need.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.36687-568838</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 08:35:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brain_drain</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: NotMyselfRightNow</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36687/The-25-might-be-the-easy-part#568892</link>	
		<description>Thanks everyone.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
rxrfrx, thanks for the ULC idea.  I had been batting it around earlier, and never did anything.  I just jumped onto their site thinking it was going to be a joke.  Five minutes later, I realized I agreed with them more than I do with the religion I was raised on.  Hmmm...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.36687-568892</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:34:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NotMyselfRightNow</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rxrfrx</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/36687/The-25-might-be-the-easy-part#568911</link>	
		<description>NMRN, the ULC itself might be some kind of joke, but the credential is legit enough to be OK for marriage in MA.  I think there was a piece about this in the Wall Street Journal some years back.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.36687-568911</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:56:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rxrfrx</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
