I have to, starting very early in the morning, and well before Friday, install Windows XP, Office 2003, and a number of small insurance applications on 9 different minitowers that are coming in. Assuming they are all exactly the same build, and hopefully, without spending any more money, what would be the quickest and most efficient way to do this?
I'm replacing all the computers in the office with some cutting-edge hardware out of Dell. I'm in town for only this week, and the shipping company that Dell used has just informed me that the computers missed the local truck this morning, and I won't get them until tomorrow. This means I have roughly 2 days to install the software, get the machines in place, and ensure that everything is running smoothly.
I should state that I'm running a Win2k3 server as the main file server, Exchange 2k3 mail server, and all the windows networking stuff.
A friend of mine suggested, because of the same hardware on all of the machines, that I should configure one machine exactly like I'd like them all, and then use a product like Norton Ghost to create an image of that machine on the network. He even managed to provide me with an under-the-table copy of Ghost, but I'm reluctant to use it given its origins as well as my unfamiliarity with the product. I'd hate to have to waste my time trying to learn the product when I could just be making new boxes.
Another idea I had would be to duplicate the XP Pro and Office 2k3 Pro install disks, and try to install the software in parallel, doing a round-robin with my monitor, keyboard, and mouse. I could manage this pretty easily, I suppose, given that XP Pro and Office 2k3 Pro are on volume license install CDs, and that I could probably get away with duplicating them for only the short term of the install period.
Does anyone have any suggestions? I'm hoping that I don't have to pull an all-nighter, but I'm psyching up for the definite possibility.
I do this sort of thing every couple of years for a client, but generally with no more than four or five machines (TOPS). I've never bothered to try to streamline the process. I simply set all the machines up in one room (using extension cords, if needed), and do the assembly-line thing, going from one computer to the next performing the same operation over and over again.
This works well for about four machines, but nine? I can imagine that might get a little unwieldy. There'd be a lot more downtime. Still, I'd try it at least once. I'm reluctant to try solutions (such as drive mirroring) that are unfamiliar to me, especially when under time pressure. And especially when I know that the assembly-line method will get me there, though perhaps a little slowly.
posted by jdroth at 9:24 AM on March 28, 2006