<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Checking grammar in HTML files?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/34005/Checking-grammar-in-HTML-files/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Checking grammar in HTML files?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:15:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Checking grammar in HTML files?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/34005/Checking-grammar-in-HTML-files</link>	
		<description>Are there any web authoring applications that have a robust grammar (not just spelling) checker? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I copyedit training content in HTML files for a living. Are there any WYSIWYG HTML editors out there that have grammar checking? Currently I&apos;m using GoLive CS for Mac (v7.0.2), whose spelling checker is weak and grammar checker nonexistent. I&apos;m having to paste content into Word, run the Word spelling/grammar checker, then paste content back into GoLive pages. Is there a better way?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.34005</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:23:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>markmillard</dc:creator>
		
			<category>web</category>
		
			<category>authoring</category>
		
			<category>grammar</category>
		
			<category>spelling</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: frogan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/34005/Checking-grammar-in-HTML-files#530099</link>	
		<description>There&apos;s no good way to perform effective grammar checks, so most software doesn&apos;t even try, and even the best software will have moderate-to-severe shortcomings. Word is the most common, obviously, and look how many issues it has -- false positives for sentence fragments, inability to gracefully handle complex clauses, etc.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.34005-530099</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>frogan</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/34005/Checking-grammar-in-HTML-files#530100</link>	
		<description>Yeah, true grammar checkers are nonexistent now and probably impossible in the foreseeable future (until computers can pass Turing tests).  Besides, if you&apos;re a copy editor, why are you trying to find a robot replacement for yourself?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.34005-530100</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:19:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: AmbroseChapel</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/34005/Checking-grammar-in-HTML-files#530168</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;I&apos;m having to paste content into Word, run the Word spelling/grammar checker, then paste content back into GoLive pages. Is there a better way?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Open the HTML files directly with Word?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But, what everyone else said. &lt;em&gt;No&lt;/em&gt; application has a truly robust grammar checker.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.34005-530168</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:24:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>AmbroseChapel</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: beelzbubba</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/34005/Checking-grammar-in-HTML-files#530558</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;But, what everyone else said. No application has a truly robust grammar checker.&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Agreed. Instead, copy Joseph Williams &lt;em&gt;Toward Clarity and Grace&lt;/em&gt; into your brain&apos;s language processor.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.34005-530558</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:52:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>beelzbubba</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: misterbrandt</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/34005/Checking-grammar-in-HTML-files#530924</link>	
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;I&apos;m having to paste content into Word, run the Word spelling/grammar checker, then paste content back into GoLive pages. Is there a better way?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Open the HTML files directly with Word?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br&gt;
But don&apos;t save that edited HTML file! Microsoft has a track record of crufting up nice, clean HTML. Maybe open a copy of the original?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I actually like your original idea of pasting the content into Word, and grammar-checking it. I would go further and just put Word and GoLive side-by-side, and make the corrections in GoLive directly. It eliminates any weirdness from Word -- inline styles, extra HTML tags, formatting, smart-quotes, non-standard entities, etc. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Give Word your &lt;strong&gt;content&lt;/strong&gt; to grammar-check, but not your well-structured HTML.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.34005-530924</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 13:06:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>misterbrandt</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
