<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Connect us</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Connect us</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:09:33 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:09:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Connect us</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us</link>	
		<description>I need to videoconference with people in multiple locations simultanously.  I&apos;m looking for software and hardware recommendations.  Inexpensive is a must. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I&apos;d like to set up a videoconference with 3 locations.  People in each location should be able to see all 3 webcams simultaneously.  Can you recommend inexpensive software that will do this?  What should I be looking for in a webcam?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33186</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:27:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Could it be, El Guapo ...</dc:creator>
		
			<category>webcam</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: kimota</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us#517427</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/ichat/&quot;&gt;Mac&lt;/a&gt; or PC?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33186-517427</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:09:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kimota</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Could it be, El Guapo ...</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us#517543</link>	
		<description>Sorry, I should have been more specific.  This will be in a PC environment on a WAN with reasonable throughput.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33186-517543</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:20:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Could it be, El Guapo ...</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: sanitycheck</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us#517594</link>	
		<description>How about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/fl/research/accessgrid/software/download.html&quot;&gt;Accessgrid&lt;/a&gt;?  The software is free, and available for Mac, PC, and Linux.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33186-517594</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:09:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sanitycheck</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: zpousman</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us#517595</link>	
		<description>This will mostly suck. The cheaper you go, the more suck you will get. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You are better off doing a voice call with a powerpoint (label the slides with numbers) or whatever. There is really not much need to see the others, espeically with only three people.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
More expensive option ($300ish each) : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.polycom.com/products_services/0,,pw-186-3027,00.html&quot;&gt;Polycom ViaVideo II&lt;/a&gt;. This camera has some processing on board, so it can have good quality.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Otherwise, just buy the cheapest webcams you can and use net meeting. One important tip if you decide to go this route: GET headset mics. This is the only way you&apos;ll get audio that&apos;s even passable. You&apos;ll look like drivethru employees, but hey, that&apos;s the cost of hearing what people say (and not some weird distorted echo of what you said 3 seconds ago).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33186-517595</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:10:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zpousman</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: zpousman</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us#517596</link>	
		<description>The accessgrid is not what you need btw. That is the software for running high bandwidth videowalls and crazy scientific collaboration systems. It&apos;s cool, but it&apos;s a bazooka to your requirement for a potato-gun.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33186-517596</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:12:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zpousman</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Could it be, El Guapo ...</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us#517602</link>	
		<description>Some good feedback so far.  Just to clarify, I&apos;m talking about 3 rooms full of people, not just 3 people.  We are currently using netmeeting with powerpoint and it does the job.  However, we&apos;d like to add some video.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I thought about just using netmeeting with webcams, but it seems like only 2 locations could participate (based on netmeeting help).  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Btw, I probably couldn&apos;t spend more than $100 per camera.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33186-517602</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:20:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Could it be, El Guapo ...</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: blueyellow</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us#517686</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sightspeed.com/&quot;&gt;Sight speed&lt;/a&gt; has very good video conferencing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1752847,00.asp&quot;&gt;quality&lt;/a&gt;. It allows multi-person video conferences. It is relatively inexpensive ($50/year for the pro version) and it comes with a free webcam.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33186-517686</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:51:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blueyellow</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: sanitycheck</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/33186/Connect-us#518094</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The accessgrid is not what you need btw. That is the software for running high bandwidth videowalls and crazy scientific collaboration systems. It&apos;s cool, but it&apos;s a bazooka to your requirement for a potato-gun.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;d respectfully disagree here.  It may be a bazooka but it is a free bazooka.  And there&apos;s no need to set up your own super-powerful node or anything.  I use the AG client from my laptop to videoconference with a research group with which I am affiliated, and it works quite well.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2006:site.33186-518094</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:52:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sanitycheck</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
