Ditto the EIA site. It's the one I use as authoritative. Backed by paper publications with a well-defined methodology, thus easy to reference, and acceptable for acedemic and other publication. The others listed, while they may well be accurate, are of uncertain providence (most don't list references), and I wouldn't consider using them for most purposes. posted by bonehead at 4:39 PM on January 3, 2006
« Older
ATI's drivers webpage is down ...
| RSS to HTML: Why can't my PHP ...
Newer »
posted by beagle at 1:50 PM on January 3, 2006