better charts than Excel?
December 29, 2005 5:16 PM Subscribe
Free Windows chart-making software that works with simple tab-separated data files and beats Excel's charts for options, esthetics, and readability?
Response by poster: Ooh yeah baby. That's what I'm talking about.
Can't seem to find a current version, though.
posted by scarabic at 6:20 PM on December 29, 2005
Can't seem to find a current version, though.
posted by scarabic at 6:20 PM on December 29, 2005
Email me at my user name at gmail.com, scarabic, if you come up empty.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 6:24 PM on December 29, 2005
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 6:24 PM on December 29, 2005
They're firmly in the camp of simple-but-clear instead of glitzy-from-many-angles, but gnuplot and R will both generate basically publication-quality graphs. Both are command-line driven and not terribly user friendly. gnuplot just does graphs, R is a complete statistical package. Both are free.
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 6:47 PM on December 29, 2005
posted by ROU_Xenophobe at 6:47 PM on December 29, 2005
R is easier to use than Gnuplot in my opinion. Still quite a learning curve to start with though. Any library book on S (the statistical programming language - been around for ever) is good for R as well by the way.
posted by singingfish at 3:16 AM on December 30, 2005
posted by singingfish at 3:16 AM on December 30, 2005
I second gnuplot, not incredibly easy to use at first, but once you get the hang of it you have a high degree of control over what the final output will look like.
posted by jduckles at 6:03 AM on December 30, 2005
posted by jduckles at 6:03 AM on December 30, 2005
R does produce nice graphs indeed. I've had no trouble getting them published. Learning R just for graphing may be a bit much though. R is a stat/math language (a free implementation of s-lang), similar in complexity to say, Ruby or Perl.
We use SigmaPlot for most of our publications though. While a bit of a bear to use, it produces the most excellent results.
posted by bonehead at 7:21 AM on December 30, 2005
We use SigmaPlot for most of our publications though. While a bit of a bear to use, it produces the most excellent results.
posted by bonehead at 7:21 AM on December 30, 2005
This thread is closed to new comments.
Worth a play if you can still find a copy.
posted by stavrosthewonderchicken at 5:43 PM on December 29, 2005