<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

      <title>Comments on: Is the "zawahiri letter" authentic? </title>
      <link>http://ask.metafilter.com/29056/Is-the-zawahiri-letter-authentic/</link>
      <description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Is the "zawahiri letter" authentic?</description>
	  	  <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:45:27 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:45:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
	  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	  <ttl>60</ttl>

<item>
  	<title>Question: Is the &quot;zawahiri letter&quot; authentic? </title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/29056/Is-the-zawahiri-letter-authentic</link>	
  	<description>Bush used the &quot;Zawahiri letter&quot; today as part of his justification for his policies and the war in Iraq ... I have heard &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.juancole.com/2005/10/zawahiri-letter-to-zarqawi-shiite.html&quot;&gt;a number of doubts&lt;/a&gt; about it&apos;s authenticity, does anyone know what the chain of custody/origin of this letter is? and what the current conventional wisdom is on its authenticity? </description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.29056</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:29:46 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>specialk420</dc:creator>
	
	<category>bush</category>
	
	<category>iraq</category>
	
	<category>zawahiri</category>
	
	<category>letter</category>
	
	<category>zarqawi</category>
	
	<category>forgery</category>
	
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: electric_counterpoint</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/29056/Is-the-zawahiri-letter-authentic#457653</link>	
  	<description>Can&apos;t speak to your question precisely, but I was there this morning and I can say I don&apos;t think he received the applause for that line that he was expecting. The audience, at the Wilson Center, were largely academics, so maybe that says something about its perception? These people applauded for a lot, but not that whole bit...</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.29056-457653</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:45:27 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>electric_counterpoint</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
  	<title>By: NoMich</title>
  	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/29056/Is-the-zawahiri-letter-authentic#457930</link>	
  	<description>Marc Lynch (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abuaardvark.com/&quot;&gt;abu Aardvark&lt;/a&gt; to you and I) has had a pretty good up &apos;n down  train of thought about this letter. Initially, he thought the letter to be real, but started digging around  &lt;a href=&quot;http://abuaardvark.typepad.com/abuaardvark/2005/10/is_zawahiris_le.html&quot;&gt;and he changed his mind&lt;/a&gt; (make sure you read the comments in that link.).  However, after some further reading and discussion and whatnot, &lt;a href=&quot;http://abuaardvark.typepad.com/abuaardvark/2005/10/zawahari_letter.html&quot;&gt;he changed his mind&lt;/a&gt; again.&lt;br&gt;
Since Zawahiri doesn&apos;t exactly have any channels of communication with Zarqawi, he thought he would use the public sphere to get his message to Zarqawi.&lt;br&gt;
Just make sure you read those links, as they clearly spell it all out for you.</description>
  	<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2008:site.29056-457930</guid>
  	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 19:45:54 -0800</pubDate>
  	<dc:creator>NoMich</dc:creator>
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>
