<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: ETF Returns</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27771/ETF-Returns/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post ETF Returns</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:57:27 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:57:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: ETF Returns</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27771/ETF-Returns</link>	
		<description>When researching Indexed ETFs or Closed-End ETFs with the intention of buying, should I be looking at the fund&apos;s Yearly NAV  Return or the Market Value Return as an indicator of success? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Which number will tell me how much the fund has earned over the various periods displayed in the fund&apos;s charts?  Which should I be paying more attention to, and if the answer is &apos;It depends on your goals&apos; then what are the differing goals that each return number is germaine to?  Also, any additional info on ETFs in general is appreciated.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27771</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:52:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spicynuts</dc:creator>
		
			<category>ETF</category>
		
			<category>spyder</category>
		
			<category>finance</category>
		
			<category>trading</category>
		
			<category>investing</category>
		
			<category>mutualfunds</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: spicynuts</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27771/ETF-Returns#437614</link>	
		<description>Oh, one other thing.  When looking at a site like &lt;a href=&quot;http://etfconnect.com/select/fundPages/sectors.asp?MFID=139469&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; when it talks about Premium/Discount, what does this mean?     Since closed end funds are bought like stocks, if I buy through my Ameritrade account, why would there be a maintenance fee or a load?  Does the ETF management company take a percent out of the return that affects the NAV or share price?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27771-437614</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:57:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spicynuts</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: patricio</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27771/ETF-Returns#437681</link>	
		<description>Only one thing I can help with - the premium/discount referred to on that site is the market price of the ETF compared to the NAV.  A premium means that the ETF is trading at a price above its NAV, a discount means its trading below it.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You can see this on the site you linked to: the NAV has increased by 23%, the share price by only 5% and the hence the discount has gone up (premium fallen)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The difference will arise because of liquidity, expectations of future performance etc. in the same way that the market cap of a company is not the same as its balance sheet value, and can be below it (i.e. investors think there&apos;s more value in selling off all the assets and winding up the company). &lt;a href=&quot;http://etfconnect.com/education/fundamentals_cef.asp#Performance&quot;&gt;Explanation on the ETF site&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And, secondly, yes there will be a management fee -- the ETF is close-ended but the manager is still stock/fund picking and will take a fee for doing that.  The return will be net of fees and expenses.  In a fund-of-fund structure the underlying funds will distribute net of their fees too so you get hit twice.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27771-437681</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:01:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patricio</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
