<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: five-digit spam</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post five-digit spam</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:57:32 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:57:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: five-digit spam</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam</link>	
		<description>Does anybody have any idea what&apos;s going on with this kind of comment spam? I&apos;m getting scads of it, with no URLs but always a mention of a five-figure number. &quot;I&apos;ve managed to save up roughly $55085 in my bank account, but I&apos;m not sure if I should buy a house or not. Do you think the market is stable or do you think that home prices will decrease by a lot?&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:50:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
		
			<category>spam</category>
		
			<category>fivedigitnumbers</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Mo Nickels</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433320</link>	
		<description>There&apos;s a bit more about it at &lt;a href=&quot;http://peterkaminski.com/archives/000467.html&quot;&gt;this blog&lt;/a&gt;, with plenty of variations mentioned.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433320</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:57:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mo Nickels</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: smackfu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433322</link>	
		<description>The number could be for tracking.  You can google the number and see how many hits come up.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433322</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:58:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smackfu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: tayknight</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433327</link>	
		<description>If it doens&apos;t have any  links or anything it is probably a email address harvester seeing which addresses don&apos;t bounce back. Since your address didn&apos;t bounce back, the harvester is probably going to assume yours is a valid address. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The five digit number might be some kind of tracking for the harvester so if bounce message didn&apos;t contain the &apos;send to&apos; address it would still be able to tell to which address the original mail was sent</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433327</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tayknight</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433332</link>	
		<description>(&lt;small&gt;Tayknight, I think you&apos;re mistaken, as languaghat is asking about website/blog comment spam, not email spam.&lt;/small&gt;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433332</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:03:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: deadfather</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433345</link>	
		<description>Seeing that some of them have URLs (from Mo Nickels&apos; link), couldn&apos;t the ones without links just be ones whose links got stripped, or were ill-formatted?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433345</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:16:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadfather</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433362</link>	
		<description>The URL mentioned in Mo Nickels&apos; link points to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amblesideprimary.com/ambleweb/mentalmaths/guessthenumber.html&quot;&gt;page on a private school&apos;s website&lt;/a&gt;, apparently designed as a (clearly non-commercial) teaching aide. It seems very unlikely that the comment spammer actually has a business interest in this elementary school&apos;s guess the number game.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433362</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:30:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jeanmari</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433392</link>	
		<description>We were flooded with this 5 digit spam over the last 7 days on our Moveable Type powered blogs, one more than the others.  I noticed it because of the strange pattern.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Yesterday?  That blog got hacked.  Every entry had imbedded links in it where someone had been able to mess with the HTML.  The HTML code wasn&apos;t showing up in the entries.  Who ever was hacking us wasn&apos;t showing up on access logs and we don&apos;t believe they cracked the code for our passwords (though we changed everything anyway).  But it was a strange coincidence, timing wise.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have no idea if there is any connection.  But I remember thinking as I was on the receiving end of the 5-digit spam, &quot;Is someone testing out our site somehow and for some purpose?&quot;  But I have little experience with spam, spammers or any kind of internet hacks...my DH programs our sites.  I&apos;m just the user researcher and one of the writers.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433392</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:59:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeanmari</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: camworld</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433437</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s highly unlikely someone hacked an MT site by sending it comment spam. My theory is that the 5-digit numbers are a sammer&apos;s tracking system so they can find out whcih MT blogs are still vulnerable to their comment-spam scripts. if they get a match in Google, they then bombard the crap out of those blogs with more comment-spam scripts. This is because unattended blogs are better for the spammer to abuse then ones who cean up after an attack within minutes of it happening.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433437</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:34:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>camworld</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: alexst</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433442</link>	
		<description>I think this might be an attempt to make it harder for people to distinguish between real spam comments and normal comments using content filters.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I believe it&apos;s supposed to work something like this&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1. Post lots of seemingly innocent comments all over the place which annoy people.&lt;br&gt;
2. Wait for them to flag it as spam and pollute their content filters&lt;br&gt;
3. Spam the same blogs with real spam which now hopefully will not get rated as spam by any content filters.&lt;br&gt;
4. ....&lt;br&gt;
5. Profit!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I could be on crack though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433442</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:40:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alexst</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: alexst</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433444</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This is because unattended blogs are better for the spammer to abuse then ones who cean up after an attack within minutes of it happening.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Considering how easy it is to spam huge quantities of blogs in not very much time I wouldn&apos;t of thought they would be trying to optimise the process like that. It just doesn&apos;t seem worth their time or effort. If it gets deleted from somewhere it doesn&apos;t cost them anything as posting a comment is essentially free.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433444</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:42:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alexst</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: tayknight</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433455</link>	
		<description>Oops. my bad. Thanks nobody.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433455</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:53:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tayknight</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433465</link>	
		<description>Looking at &lt;a href=&quot;http://wen-xin.net/&quot;&gt;this site&lt;/a&gt; might offer a clue. The &quot;recent comments&quot; sidebar currently shows five different instances of this sort of comment spam.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Three of them (commenting on the same entry) include the same random number, which is interesting. Another links to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amblesideprimary.com/ambleweb/mentalmaths/guessthenumber.html&quot;&gt;the guess a number game&lt;/a&gt; from the elementary school website, and a fifth one links to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.funbrain.com/guess/&quot;&gt;a different number guessing game&lt;/a&gt; on a Pearson Education owned site.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I wonder if this is simply a sort of contest among spambots, the link to the number games being a nice touch, almost funny, like wry graffiti.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433465</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:03:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobody</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: bemis</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433636</link>	
		<description>Five digit spam with home price/morgage/buying keywords makes me think they&apos;re trying to get hits from people googling zip codes.  But, why disguise them?  And why no URLs?  It is a mystery-</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433636</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:30:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bemis</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433759</link>	
		<description>Yeah, it is a mystery, isn&apos;t it?  But at least I know it&apos;s not just me.  And it&apos;s fun to see the other examples: Betsy Markum and Courtney Gidts are the same &quot;gals&quot; who have been spamming me, the little hussies!  Thanks for all suggestions, and I hope someone figures out the Answer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433759</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 06:23:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mikel</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433795</link>	
		<description>I think there might be a couple of goals.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First would be to place a seemingly innocuous but very identifiable number on as many sites as possible in order to search for the sites that have allowed these comments and thus identify them as high-priority spam targets. We&apos;ve seen this happening for quite a while now in many different formats.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Secondly, though, it might be an attempt to do a kind of Google bomb on a site that otherwise would have a very low pagerank score. This would allow a spammer to demonstrate their ability to deliver ranking via comment spamming. The elementary school site has a pagerank of 3, which is quite low but even if the spammers could demonstrate any effect at all they will have succeeded.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433795</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 07:22:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mikel</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: shepd</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433865</link>	
		<description>If they&apos;re all identical except the number, perhaps someone has scripted a way to check if messages are identical, and discard identical messages?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433865</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:50:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shepd</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433872</link>	
		<description>They&apos;re not; the messages are all different, they just have a five-digit number somewhere inside.  I have, however, added &quot;Gidts&quot; to my MT-Blacklist -- what a weird &quot;name&quot;!  Hmm... on googling, I discover it&apos;s apparently a Dutch name, but most of the hits are for our naughty Courtney.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433872</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:59:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: growabrain</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/27500/fivedigit-spam#433914</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve been getting the same 5-digit spams from the same Courtney Gidts &amp;amp; others -</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.27500-433914</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:51:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>growabrain</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
