Fafblog, if you're into politics. Or even if you're not. I quote:
The Medium Lobster is a higher being with superior knowledge from beyond space and time. To your limited perception, he appears to be just another medium lobster. To your limited perception.
4chan.org /b/ is the ironic center. In some ways the quintessence of the internet. Not a blog however, an image/message board. Not for the squeamish. posted by anticlock at 4:37 PM on November 3, 2005
I emailed you what would be a blatant self-link. Check the email listed in your profile. posted by LionIndex at 4:43 PM on November 3, 2005
This one belongs to a mefi member, but I can't remember which one: solipsistic.org. And, by the way LionIndex, self linking is ok in comments. From the guidelines: it's ok to link to your own things as comments in threads, if it adds to the discussion and/or saves space because you're written a reply elsewhere posted by dmo at 5:22 PM on November 3, 2005
And, by the way LionIndex, self linking is ok in comments.
I know that's okay on the blue, but in here, where someone's basically asking for a product recommendation, it seems kind of skeevy to step up and recommend what is essentially my own product. posted by LionIndex at 5:32 PM on November 3, 2005
I've mentioned it here before, but I've been writing a blog from the viewpoint of a member of a cult in world of warcraft who also happens to be a humanoid bull. I've got about a month's worth of postings in there, and some vague weirdness. I like to think I'm witty, but your mileage may vary.
If anyone is curious, here is the blog LionIndex e-mailed me: Vangaurds. It's FANTASTIC (and now it's not a self-link). posted by panoptican at 5:38 PM on November 3, 2005
Before there were blogs, there was Usenet, and for a long time, James "Kibo" Perryhas frequently posted absurd and surreal things there. You can read them using Google Groups, or your favorite newsreader. posted by CrunchyFrog at 6:03 PM on November 3, 2005
Plurp has been dormant for a year and a half now, but it had some fine absurdist moments. Not all of it was absurdist, but there was that element to it.
self link. My blog was originally supposed to be 1/3rd surreal/nonsense writing, but I let the other 2/3rds take over. Your question reminded me of my original intentions. Thanks! (Note: one should generally write for oneself, but it's hard not to think about whether or not other people might like it. But with surreal stuff, I find potential reaction is much harder to grasp. It seems extremely subjective. Which can be powerful if you can completely let go of expectations re: what other people might think.) posted by grumblebee at 2:33 PM on November 4, 2005
« Older
Name that tune - Céline et Jul...
| Where/how can I watch the Brit...
Newer »
posted by speranza at 4:29 PM on November 3, 2005