<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Identify this font</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Identify this font</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:24:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Identify this font</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font</link>	
		<description>Can someone identify the font on &lt;a href=&quot;http://zert0.com/image.jpg&quot;&gt;this picture&lt;/a&gt;? It could be a really simple one, but I can&apos;t tell my fonts apart.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 16:52:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anoxs</dc:creator>
		
			<category>font</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: cadastral</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417448</link>	
		<description>I&apos;d suggest manually seperating the characters in your preferred image editing program (or if you&apos;re not able to do that, finding someone who can do it for you... would do it myself but don&apos;t have the time at the moment) and then uploading the file to a (free) online font recognition service.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My favorite is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myfonts.com/WhatTheFont/&quot;&gt;What the Font&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In this case, you&apos;re going to have to eliminate the second &quot;line&quot; of text for the program to be able to recognize it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you can&apos;t work it, or find someone who can... email me and I&apos;ll do it when I get a second later today.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417448</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cadastral</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: smackfu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417462</link>	
		<description>I was bored, so I cut it up in Photoshop and tried it in What the Font.  Regrettably, it didn&apos;t find anything that was very close.  I was surprised since it looks very familiar.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417462</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:38:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smackfu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: clh</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417485</link>	
		<description>It looks like &lt;a href=http://www.fonts.com/findfonts/detail.htm?pid=403566&amp;grab_id=0&amp;page_id=6146&amp;query=cooper%20black&gt;Cooper Black &lt;/a&gt; to me.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417485</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:17:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>clh</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: iconomy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417495</link>	
		<description>To me too. It looks a lot like Cooper Black Outline Condensed, with part of the second A changed with a  graphics program to resemble an upside-down heart or part of a spade, both of which would work with the word Blackjack.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417495</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:27:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>iconomy</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: clh</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417504</link>	
		<description>Want to know &lt;a href=http://www.veer.com/ideas/btt/&gt; more &lt;/a&gt;about Cooper Black?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417504</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:36:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>clh</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Robot Johnny</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417558</link>	
		<description>Not to bust the whole &quot;marked as best answer&quot; thing you got goin&apos; here, but that&apos;s definitely &lt;em&gt;not&lt;em&gt; Cooper Black.  Cooper Black has much rounder shapes... look at the top of the &quot;a&quot; and the serifs on &quot;B&quot; &quot;l&quot; and &quot;k&quot;...&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417558</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:46:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robot Johnny</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: solid-one-love</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417565</link>	
		<description>I agree with Robot Johnny. It looks very little like Cooper Black.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417565</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 19:56:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>solid-one-love</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: electric_counterpoint</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417587</link>	
		<description>I agree with Robot Johnny and solid-one-love. It looks chunky like Cooper Black, but crossed with the Rolling Stone logo.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417587</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:20:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>electric_counterpoint</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Goblindegook</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417596</link>	
		<description>Robot Johnny is right, that&apos;s definitely not Cooper Black.  The font bears a few similarities to Goudy Heavyface, but that&apos;s still very much not it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417596</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:33:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Goblindegook</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: wendell</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417714</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s pretty close to the &quot;Alfredo Hollow&quot; (NOT to be confused with &quot;Alfredo&apos;s Dance&quot;, which is totally different) that is on some of the &apos;Famous Fonts&apos; sites as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sharkshock.com/fonts/fontspub.html&quot;&gt;Garfield&lt;/a&gt;... just look at it in Italic... not exact, but the same general shapes.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417714</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 03:30:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417773</link>	
		<description>And thus we see for the hundredth time why I think the idea of giving special weight to answers marked &quot;best&quot; is silly.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417773</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 06:33:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: andrew cooke</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417799</link>	
		<description>it&apos;s not special weight, it&apos;s a different coloured background.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; might give special weight to things with a different coloured background.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
and anyway, isn&apos;t the motivation more about social engineering - to engender a certain earnestness in us all?  teachers don&apos;t give out gold stars because they think they&apos;re a great reward for their favourite pupil; they do it to make the people at the back of the class feel bad.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417799</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 07:02:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew cooke</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: andrew cooke</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417807</link>	
		<description>and also, aren&apos;t you being presciptivist :oP</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417807</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 07:07:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew cooke</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Goblindegook</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#417965</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/26479#417714&quot;&gt;wendell&lt;/a&gt; sez: &quot;just look at it in Italic... not exact, but the same general shapes.&quot;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Bear in mind that the font in the picture does not display &lt;i&gt;true&lt;/i&gt; italics, though.  A properly italicised lower case &apos;a&apos; seldom looks like that, which leads me to suspect the logo designer simply tilted the text for effect.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-417965</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:36:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Goblindegook</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: luriete</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#418058</link>	
		<description>This is absolutely nothing like Cooper Black or any of Oz Cooper&apos;s very rounded letterforms. Looks more like an obliqued Utopia Black, but softer, and the serifs are a bit more pronounced; probably had a same-color stroke applied to it at some point.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Myfonts &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myfonts.com/WhatTheFont/&quot;&gt;Whatthefont&lt;/a&gt; gives us no response, as the sample is too tight. Try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.typophile.com/&quot;&gt;Typophile&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s type identification board.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-418058</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:39:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luriete</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#418071</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;and also, aren&apos;t you being presciptivist :oP&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You&apos;re just jealous &apos;cause &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; don&apos;t have the complete OED.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
*preens*</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-418071</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 11:55:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: luriete</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/26479/Identify-this-font#418088</link>	
		<description>Well, &lt;a href=&quot;http://typophile.com/node/16001&quot;&gt;there&apos;s your final answer&lt;/a&gt;, from Mark Simonson himself:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&quot;It&apos;s some kind of slanted ultrabold version of Bembo. Unfortunately, I can&apos;t find a digital version that bold. In case they were wondering, the bottom line is slanted Palatino...&quot;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.26479-418088</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 12:24:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luriete</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
