<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Desktop Search ?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24755/Desktop-Search/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Desktop Search ?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:35:03 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:35:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Desktop Search ?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24755/Desktop-Search</link>	
		<description>Desktop Search for Windows XP Pro - Which one to use, now that they have all been out for a while?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I am looking for the fastest indexer, which I can leave on all the time while  consuming the least resources. NB 14 days later and Google still hasn&apos;t completed indexing my 55 GB hard drive (or it has and has left out many files/emails)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24755</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:04:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Voyageman</dc:creator>
		
			<category>desktop</category>
		
			<category>search</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: gfrobe</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24755/Desktop-Search#392407</link>	
		<description>That doesn&apos;t seem right.  Google indexed my 40gb drive overnight.  I changed over to MSN though because Google didn&apos;t seem to be able to handle my moving a message to a new folder in Outlook.  When I did, it would still turn up in Google Desktop search result but it was unable to locate or open the file.  MSN seems a bit better on this front.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24755-392407</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:35:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gfrobe</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: selfnoise</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24755/Desktop-Search#392485</link>	
		<description>I am currently using Copernic on my work computer.  I was originally using Google Desktop 2.0, but it really brought my creaky 800mhz PC to its knees.  Copernic runs a lot faster and seems to index all my files just fine.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Copernic doesn&apos;t index documents in zip files or some other fancy stuff, but it does catch my Outlook emails and contacts, and it does a great job indexing the text of PDF files.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24755-392485</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:03:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>selfnoise</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Iax</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24755/Desktop-Search#392507</link>	
		<description>I second copernic, it seems to do a good job, and it handles indexing across network drives much better too.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24755-392507</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:48:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Iax</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ThePants</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24755/Desktop-Search#392529</link>	
		<description>Google doesn&apos;t index my Thunderbird mail well either (it doesn&apos;t seem to detect that the junk mail filter has deleted an email, thus leaving the display filled with offers for &quot;CH43P V1Agr4!!!!1&quot;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But it indexed both my 40Gb drives in a few hours, and the WebClips panel is a useful &apos;always-on&apos; front-end to a full blown rss reader.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24755-392529</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:07:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ThePants</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mattr</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24755/Desktop-Search#392689</link>	
		<description>I use MSN Search on a number of machines (don&apos;t laugh) and get admirably fast and comprehensive results...indexing initially is pretty fast, then virtually transparent.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Its come a long way since initial incarnations.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24755-392689</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:56:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mattr</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
