<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: How to make the Windows firewall play nice with tracert?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post How to make the Windows firewall play nice with tracert?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:16:55 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:16:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: How to make the Windows firewall play nice with tracert?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert</link>	
		<description>WinXP question: &lt;code&gt;tracert&lt;/code&gt; only works when the Windows firewall is turned off. I&apos;ve added \windows\system32\tracert.exe to the approved programs list, but no luck. Any ideas?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:12:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stopgap</dc:creator>
		
			<category>tracert</category>
		
			<category>firewall</category>
		
			<category>windows</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: bachelor#3</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert#382033</link>	
		<description>Are you letting ICMP packets through? I believe that&apos;s what is used by WinXP&apos;s trace route program.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036-382033</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:16:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bachelor#3</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: moz</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert#382036</link>	
		<description>the traceroute program on unix (as on windows) relies on two protocols; ICMP and UDP.  make sure that you&apos;re allowing packets for both protocols.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036-382036</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:19:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>moz</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: benzo8</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert#382037</link>	
		<description>The blocking of ICMP packets is one of the things most &quot;Personal Firewalls&quot; get wrong. They sell the concept of &quot;security through obscurity&quot; - if you can&apos;t see the machine, you can&apos;t try and hack it. But blocking ICMP breaks PING and (as you&apos;ve discovered) traceroute, amongst other things, and there are other, non-ICMP-based scans that a hacker can use to see you machine, so it&apos;s pointless anyhow... Let ICMP in and out of your firewall.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036-382037</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:19:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benzo8</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: zsazsa</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert#382042</link>	
		<description>Weird. tracert has always worked for me with the stock XP firewall turned on.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036-382042</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:26:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zsazsa</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: bachelor#3</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert#382046</link>	
		<description>moz, I think Windows XP uses ICMP packets &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/tracert.mspx&quot;&gt;exclusively &lt;/a&gt;for tracert. Most other trace route programs send out UDP packets.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036-382046</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:27:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bachelor#3</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mendel</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert#382053</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;the traceroute program on unix (as on windows) relies on two protocols; ICMP and UDP.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Correct for Unix; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tech-faq.com/unix-windows-traceroute.shtml&quot;&gt;not so for Windows&lt;/a&gt;, which uses only ICMP.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;But blocking ICMP breaks PING and (as you&apos;ve discovered) traceroute, amongst other things&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Remember that traceroute is looking for ICMP ttl-expired (which are critical to being able to use the network without your sent packets quietly disappearing) and not ICMP echo-reply (which is only useful for ping itself).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That said, include me in the &quot;it works for me&quot; department. Crank up your XP firewall logging to log dropped packets and see exactly what it&apos;s blocking, for a start.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036-382053</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:38:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mendel</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: stopgap</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert#382089</link>	
		<description>ICMP packets were turned off. I allowed them and now everything works as expected. Thanks AskMe!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036-382089</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:13:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stopgap</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: RustyBrooks</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert#382093</link>	
		<description>There is good reason to block ICMP packets, and it&apos;s not security-through-obscurity.  They are (were?) a populare method of denial-of-service attacks.  The attacker would flood you with pings and this would increase network latency and bandwidth to near unusability.  Happened to me several times until I disabled ICMP.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, if I&apos;m not mistaken, in the earlier days of routers, ICMP could be used to configure routers to a certain extent.  You could basically send a command to a router that the next hop for this address should be X.X.X.X instead of Y.Y.Y.Y.  This would allow an attacker to route his targets traffic through a machine he controlled, with no one the wiser.  From there he could sniff away at it.  This is sort of urban-legendish, I&apos;ve never seen credible accounts of it being done and I suspect not too many routers ever had such features enabled.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That said, let ICMP through.  If you get DOSed, turn it off.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036-382093</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:20:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RustyBrooks</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: RustyBrooks</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/24036/How-to-make-the-Windows-firewall-play-nice-with-tracert#382094</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=http://www.faqs.org/docs/securing/chap5sec57.html&gt;Here&apos;s an example of my second point&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.24036-382094</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 10:21:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RustyBrooks</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
