<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Marginal Revenue, Residual Demand Curves, Quotas and Monopolists</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/236167/Marginal-Revenue-Residual-Demand-Curves-Quotas-and-Monopolists/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Marginal Revenue, Residual Demand Curves, Quotas and Monopolists</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:24:58 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:34:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Marginal Revenue, Residual Demand Curves, Quotas and Monopolists</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/236167/Marginal-Revenue-Residual-Demand-Curves-Quotas-and-Monopolists</link>	
		<description>How do I calculate the differences in welfare for a state when an import quota is applied to an industry that is controlled by a monopolist at home, vs an industry that is perfectly competitive at home? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Hi all,&lt;br&gt;
I have a problem set for grad school that is asking me to calculate something that wasn&apos;t explained in class and doesn&apos;t appear to be in my textbooks as well.  I am being asked to compare the differences in welfare losses to a home market when an import quota is applied to a perfectly competitive market, but I don&apos;t know how to calculate this for a market dominated by a monopolist.  I&apos;m given the home market&apos;s demand function and the marginal cost function for producers, which in the problem is the same for perfectly competitive firms and a monopolist, as well as the world price for the good.  I think I need to calculate the marginal revenue function as well as a residual demand curve that would exist for the monopolist if a quota was applied, but I am not sure how to do this.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;m not asking anyone to solve the problem for me, but could someone please point me to a book, internet resource, etc, where I can find an explanation for how to go about calculating this?  I have searched around for a while now, but haven&apos;t found anything so I&apos;ve turned to askmefi.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2013:site.236167</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:24:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tokaidanshi</dc:creator>
		
			<category>trade</category>
		
			<category>policy</category>
		
			<category>monopoly</category>
		
			<category>economics</category>
		
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: obviousresistance</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/236167/Marginal-Revenue-Residual-Demand-Curves-Quotas-and-Monopolists#3422763</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ll try, but I might not be super helpful. I&apos;m in an advanced micro undergraduate class, and we are using Nicholson&apos;s Microeconomic Theory. I found a section on welfare losses and monopolies, but we haven&apos;t covered monopolies yet, so this is just me typing it out. I think you can skip to the bottom and just calculate out the ratio of consumer surpluses, with monopoly/perfect competition. You were given the average cost function, so you can multiple that by q to get total costs. Because total costs = P^e (see below), you probably should multiply that through instead of q. Use demand to calculate elasticity. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is what my book pretty much says: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Assume that the monopoly has constant marginal and average costs &quot;c,&quot; and that the demand curve has a constant elasticity of the form &quot;Q=P^e&quot;, then the competitive price will be Pc=c and the monopoly price is Pm=c/(1+1/e). Consumer surplus is the integral from P0 to infinity of Q(P)dP. (P0 = &quot;p-naught&quot;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This integral is actually -P0^(e+1)/(e+1).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Under perfect competition, consumer surplus, CSc, is -c^(e+1)/(e+1), and under monopoly, consumer surplus, CSm, is -[(c/(1+1/e))^(e+1)]/(e+1) (that&apos;s &quot;c divided by 1 plus 1/e, all to the e+1, all divided by e+1, all negative). &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Taking the ratio of the two surpluses gives you: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
CSm/CSc = (1/(1+1/e))^(e+1)&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Again, I think you can just skip to the CSm/CSc step. I think everything else was the proof. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Did that help? Please please please if anyone stumbles across this and knows I&apos;m wrong, correct it, because I just typed it out of the book.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2013:site.236167-3422763</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:34:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>obviousresistance</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: obviousresistance</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/236167/Marginal-Revenue-Residual-Demand-Curves-Quotas-and-Monopolists#3422767</link>	
		<description>!!!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~ebayrak/teaching/500F12/XYZ.pdf&quot;&gt;I found a PDF of Nicholson&apos;s book here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Look at page 499, starting on the bottom.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2013:site.236167-3422767</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:39:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>obviousresistance</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: obviousresistance</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/236167/Marginal-Revenue-Residual-Demand-Curves-Quotas-and-Monopolists#3423595</link>	
		<description>Funnily enough, we ended up going over this exact topic/example today in class. Memail me with any questions.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2013:site.236167-3423595</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:22:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>obviousresistance</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
