Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. -- Should there be a comma before Inc.?
February 20, 2013 5:30 PM Subscribe
Sorry for the esoteric legal question, but I'm intrigued by this case name. I thought that "Inc." was always preceded by a comma in a party name. Yet this case doesn't seem to include the comma: Sorrell v. IMS Health, Inc., 131 S. Ct. 2653 (2011) http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/10-779.pdf A quick Googling shows a mixed bag of comma use. Does anyone have any idea whether the comma belongs or not? Thanks!