<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Which scanner should I get?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23316/Which-scanner-should-I-get/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Which scanner should I get?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:32:36 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:32:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Which scanner should I get?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23316/Which-scanner-should-I-get</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m looking for a scanner at around the $200 range. I would like a flatbed scanner which can take 35mm and 120 film. Problem is, my eMac doesn&apos;t have USB 2.0, so many of the nice scanners they have nowadays won&apos;t connect to my machine. So, it needs to be Firewire-compatible. With all that in mind, what model should I get? Will I have to go used? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; (Also, I&apos;ve heard that you can&apos;t upgrade a non-USB 2.0-having eMac to a USB 2.0-having state. Could that possible be untrue? Weep.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23316</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:30:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sticherbeast</dc:creator>
		
			<category>scanners</category>
		
			<category>flatbed</category>
		
			<category>firewire</category>
		
			<category>emac</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Wild_Eep</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23316/Which-scanner-should-I-get#371673</link>	
		<description>IIRC, USB2 scanners should work just fine in USB ports, but they&apos;ll simply operate more slowly.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23316-371673</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:32:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wild_Eep</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: adamrice</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23316/Which-scanner-should-I-get#371674</link>	
		<description>You can connect USB 2 to USB 1.1. It&apos;ll be relatively slow, but it&apos;ll work.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23316-371674</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:32:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>adamrice</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Sticherbeast</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23316/Which-scanner-should-I-get#371680</link>	
		<description>I feel stupid and relieved. Thank you all!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23316-371680</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:54:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sticherbeast</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: luriete</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23316/Which-scanner-should-I-get#371696</link>	
		<description>There is a rumor that Apple is working on USB 2.0 drivers for the next revision of 10.4.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23316-371696</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:17:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luriete</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cillit bang</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23316/Which-scanner-should-I-get#371704</link>	
		<description>What do you mean luriete? Mac OS X has supported USB 2.0 for two years (since the first hardware shipped), if not before.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Could that possible be untrue?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Well, you can always upgrade an eMac to USB 2.0 via the magic of eBay.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23316-371704</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:22:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cillit bang</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
