<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Family Photo Project</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Family Photo Project</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:38:17 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:38:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Family Photo Project</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project</link>	
		<description>Family Photo Project - I&apos;m working on a &quot;How to&quot; for a project to turn my family&apos;s entire photo history into a easily searchable, sortable, and archived digital collection. I would like some insight on my plan. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mrozinski.org/archives/2005/08/the_family_phot_1.html&quot;&gt;You can find my plan here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/people/mrozinskifamily/&quot;&gt;You can find the eventual Flickr home here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I have a ton of questions, but what I really would like is for some people to read the plan over and see what you think about it. Are there any major problems with the details? Is there anything I&apos;m over looking? Any story&apos;s? Any other plans exist that I can reference? This is a lot of work to do and I&apos;m trying to anticipate problems, before I have to go back and start from the beginning.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you could make any suggestions or comments, that would be much appreciated. But for those more interested, here are some more detailed questions I had.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1. Am I scanning the photos at a high enough resolution?&lt;br&gt;
2. Am I saving the files the right way, in the correct file formats?&lt;br&gt;
3. Is my scanner of a quality that is up to this task?&lt;br&gt;
4. Should I be color correcting and cropping old photos? (I feel this takes away from their authenticity when I fix the colors. Or am I just fixing what time couldn&apos;t)&lt;br&gt;
5. Is the software I&apos;m using (Adobe Photoshop and Photoshop Elements 3 with photo album) the correct software to scan, fix, and Album my photos.&lt;br&gt;
6. I&apos;m only putting the lower resolution Jpgs into the Adobe Elements Album, should I be placing the originals in there too and somehow connecting them together?&lt;br&gt;
7. When I crop a photo such as a 3.5x3.5 that has a white border. Should I crop the excess around the white border? Or crop the white border off as well?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Paying a service to do this for me is not an option as I&apos;m sure its pricey, and I&apos;m a poor college student. But...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
8. What reliable services are there that would do this? Any story&apos;s or experiences?&lt;br&gt;
9. I don&apos;t plan on scanning the negatives (even though the scanner can) as I don&apos;t like the way they come out. But for the future, what services are there where I can have the negatives professionally scanned.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
10. Is there anything about the project that makes it pointless because it will have to be redone in a few years?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Please pass on any links, comments, stories or advice. I&apos;ll take it all in and am going to try to reference it into my plan.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23030</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mroz</dc:creator>
		
			<category>Flickr</category>
		
			<category>Family</category>
		
			<category>Photos</category>
		
			<category>Photography</category>
		
			<category>Scan</category>
		
			<category>Scanning</category>
		
			<category>Archive</category>
		
			<category>FamilyPhotoProject</category>
		
			<category>Howto</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: LadyBonita</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project#367967</link>	
		<description>Right now I can only answer one question: #4&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Never crop the photos unless there is absolutely nothing there.  Later generations will appreciate the view of the family car or grandma&apos;s old couch.  If you&apos;d like to crop for a close up of a face, go ahead - but keep the original, too.  Also don&apos;t crop the white borders if this was the norm for the time period of the picture - okay for your niece&apos;s school pic taken last year; not okay for a 1950 pic.  Stay original as best you can, like you said, keep it authentic&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Color correct, etc. only if the photo is physically damaged.  If you must correct, then again save a scan of the original.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Good luck.  It&apos;s sounds like such a fun and meaningful project.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23030-367967</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:38:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LadyBonita</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: aladfar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project#367992</link>	
		<description>Assuming most of the photos were shot on 35mm film, you&apos;ll have better and more consistent results (and a lot less handling of the materials) if you get a negative scanner. It will allow you to scan at a higher resolution (I&apos;d go for the maximum you&apos;re able to store) and it reduces the surfaces that you&apos;ll need to clean - no glass or scanner cover to worry about.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And you might want to invest in some dust guns. Make certain that you&apos;re negatives (or photographs if you stick with the flatbed) are absolutely clean. Dust specks and fingerprints are frustratingly visible in high res scans.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Good luck!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23030-367992</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:12:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aladfar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Mroz</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project#367994</link>	
		<description>Alot of it isn&apos;t shot on 35mm. A bunch 110, and a ton of the old stuff on I don&apos;t know what. I havn&apos;t seen the negatives yet, but I&apos;m positive its not 35mm. Any leads on a recomended negative scanner?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23030-367994</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:20:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mroz</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Mroz</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project#368007</link>	
		<description>Is there something called a dust gun beyond air powered cans? Thats all I&apos;m finding online, but I pictured something with a static charge or something like that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23030-368007</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:32:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mroz</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: delfuego</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project#368015</link>	
		<description>Negative scanners can get &lt;strong&gt;very&lt;/strong&gt; expensive very quickly, but there are a few good entry-level ones that are plenty good enough for what you want to do.  Minolta makes one right now that I love -- it&apos;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0001BG1SI/qid=1124851399/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-3143963-5847359?v=glance&amp;s=pc&amp;n=507846&quot;&gt;DiMAGE Scan Dual IV&lt;/a&gt;.  Of course, most film scanners at the entry-level price range won&apos;t handle anything but 35mm slides and negative strips plus/minus Advantix rolls, so you might not even want to consider this route.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As for handling the negatives themselves, you can use a powered air can PLUS a static dust brush; &lt;a href=&gt;Staticmaster makes the best ones&lt;/a&gt;.  You might also want to think about lightweight cotton gloves; fingerprints almost always show up on scanned negatives if you look close enough. :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23030-368015</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:45:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>delfuego</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Mroz</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project#368022</link>	
		<description>Looking good. There are still a ton of photos that this won&apos;t cover. There is a claim that all the negatives still exist, but I won&apos;t believe till I see.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
How large of a print can I get from scanning a negative?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23030-368022</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:57:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mroz</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: delfuego</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project#368026</link>	
		<description>Realistically, as large as you want, but of course it depends on the quality of the film scanner.  I&apos;d guess that the scan quality from that Minolta is easily good enough to make a huge (20x30 or bigger) print; I made a 20x30 from a negative scan I did on a predecessor of that scanner, and it looks &lt;em&gt;great&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23030-368026</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:04:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>delfuego</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: JJ86</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/23030/Family-Photo-Project#368151</link>	
		<description>For archival purposes, nothing beats film that is properly stored. That means in a semi-dry environment with relatively constant temperaure and humidity. CD&apos;s are not archival unless you spend some money on the special gold ones specifically for that purpose. Even those are not 100% guaranteed if image formats change or CD&apos;s become the 5-1/4&quot; floppies of the future.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
By all means, scan the film to make it more accessible to family on the internet or with interactive CD&apos;s. But unless you have some prints you want to make then stick with smaller resolutions/image sizes. For a decent photo quality 8x10 size print, I don&apos;t think you need to go much beyond 300dpi. I have a Minolta DiMage Dual Scan for negative formats up to 6x9cm and it works great for making high quality and large prints. But it is pricey at around $1800 (still much cheaper than an equivalent quality digital camera).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.23030-368151</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2005 01:28:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JJ86</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
