<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Refurbed Mac Pro or new 21.5 inch iMac w Fusion drive?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/229343/Refurbed-Mac-Pro-or-new-215-inch-iMac-w-Fusion-drive/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Refurbed Mac Pro or new 21.5 inch iMac w Fusion drive?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:04:20 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:07:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Refurbed Mac Pro or new 21.5 inch iMac w Fusion drive?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/229343/Refurbed-Mac-Pro-or-new-215-inch-iMac-w-Fusion-drive</link>	
		<description>Refurbed Mac Pro or new 21.5 inch iMac w Fusion drive? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The new iMacs are coming soon. In theory. But there&apos;s been a lot of grumbling about how performance has been sacrificed simply to make the computer look good (and perhaps preserve the market share of the Pro line).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So the question is this: Would it make more sense to pick up a refurbed Mac Pro instead of waiting around for the iMac?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don&apos;t care what the machine looks like, or how loud it is. I need it for video editing, movie-watching, and some gaming. And I need it for whatever demands future software, as it inevitably bulks up, will demand of it -- I&apos;m not interested in buying a computer that is basically out of date a week after I purchase it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So between these roughly cost-equivalent options, which is the better choice? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
21.5-inch iMac&lt;br&gt;
2.9GHz quad-core Intel Core i5&lt;br&gt;
Turbo Boost up to 3.6GHz&lt;br&gt;
8GB (two 4GB) memory&lt;br&gt;
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 512MB&lt;br&gt;
Fusion drive&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Mac Pro&lt;br&gt;
2.8GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon &quot;Nehalem&quot; processor&lt;br&gt;
3GB (3 x 1GB) of 1066MHz DDR3 ECC memory&lt;br&gt;
1TB Serial ATA 7200 rpm&lt;br&gt;
ATI Radeon HD 5770 with 1GB GDDR5 memory</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.229343</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:04:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hobbacocka</dc:creator>
		
			<category>imac</category>
		
			<category>macpro</category>
		
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puritycontrol</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/229343/Refurbed-Mac-Pro-or-new-215-inch-iMac-w-Fusion-drive#3318941</link>	
		<description>I came here thinking I had a clear answer, but the more I think about it, I&apos;m as torn as you!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Mac Pro Cons:&lt;br&gt;
- I don&apos;t know much about the high-end Xeon processors, but the Mac Pro you mention is pushing 2.5 years old, which is pretty old IMO.  It won&apos;t be out of date quickly, but it&apos;s much further along than a new iMac or 2012 Mac Pro.  &lt;br&gt;
- You will probably want to upgrade the RAM on the Pro right off the bat. Extra $$.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Mac Pro Pros:&lt;br&gt;
- Already has a DVD drive. Save $30 for not having to buy external DVD drive for iMac, put towards extra RAM.&lt;br&gt;
- User upgradeable.  Maybe have fusion drive installed in the future?&lt;br&gt;
- Monitor size is not limited by the machine itself.  If you have multiple monitors already, you can keep using all of them.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
iMac Cons:&lt;br&gt;
- That smallish 21.5&quot; screen.  I&apos;m not a fan, but maybe you&apos;re not as picky as me.  It will be a gorgeous screen to look at, though; just on the small side.&lt;br&gt;
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cultofmac.com/197623/new-21-inch-imac-wont-let-users-upgrade-ram-themselves-but-27-inch-imac-will/&quot;&gt;RAM won&apos;t be user upgradeable&lt;/a&gt;, but you may never need to do it anyways.&lt;br&gt;
- I can&apos;t say for sure, but the screen might not be fixable either, if something happens. The screens on the Retina MacBooks are fused to the body (to keep things extra thin, I think), so who knows if they&apos;re going that route on the new iMacs.&lt;br&gt;
- Need to buy an external DVD drive, probably.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
iMac Pros:&lt;br&gt;
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtu.be/d0M6pv9qAH4&quot;&gt;This video&lt;/a&gt; does a pretty good job of showing how ridiculously fast the Fusion drive is relative to the standard 5400 rpm HDD, so depending on your needs, it may or may not be a must-have.  I just bought a new Mac Mini and opted to skip the Fusion because the only real-use benefit I&apos;d probably see is a boot time of 15 sec instead of 30 sec.  I can&apos;t say what benefits you might see using a Fusion drive for video editing or gaming.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Personally, I think the Mac Pro is a better option, but that&apos;s based on my needs and preferences.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macrumors.com/2012/06/12/apple-spokesperson-confirms-new-mac-pro-and-imac-designs-likely-coming-in-2013/&quot;&gt;They will be refreshing the Mac Pro sometime in 2013&lt;/a&gt;, so I think your best option is to wait to see what&apos;s in store.  You would at least be able to get refurbed June 2012 Mac Pros at a better price, which would probably be worth it for the processor  + RAM upgrade.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.229343-3318941</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 20:07:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>puritycontrol</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: holgate</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/229343/Refurbed-Mac-Pro-or-new-215-inch-iMac-w-Fusion-drive#3318971</link>	
		<description>On Hypercritical, John Siracusa described the new iMac as something like &quot;laptop hardware inside a really nice display&quot;, which is fair comment, although laptop hardware these days is pretty impressive for most users. He&apos;s waiting for whatever replaces the Mac Pro; right now, the hardware is aging, and you don&apos;t get the improvements of recent years like Thunderbolt for I/O and display, or native SATA III or USB 3.0 or PCIE3. I wouldn&apos;t say it&apos;s &quot;out of date&quot;, but it&apos;s a dead end in many ways.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you have to buy right now, I&apos;d also think in terms of potential resale when the mythical replacement comes along, and my guess is that while there&apos;s a small but constant market for Apple tower hardware from people who need drive bays and I/O ports and card slots, a lot of old towers will hit the market and the resale price will plummet, whereas a nearly-new iMac will probably hold on to more of its value if you decide it&apos;s not up to snuff. (Not that computers are anything but depreciating goods...)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you&apos;re doing serious video-editing, you&apos;ll probably want some kind of external drive setup anyway.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.229343-3318971</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:21:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: holgate</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/229343/Refurbed-Mac-Pro-or-new-215-inch-iMac-w-Fusion-drive#3318991</link>	
		<description>And sticking with the 5by5 posse, Marco Arment&apos;s blog post on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marco.org/2012/06/15/back-to-the-mac&quot;&gt;buying a &quot;new-old&quot; Mac Pro in June&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;This new-old Mac Pro will make me very happy for the next 12&#8211;18 months until the next model comes out, and then I&apos;ll decide what to do. If the next one sucks for some reason, I can skip it. And if it&apos;s good enough to buy, I&apos;ll sell this one, probably losing about $1000 on it. To me, it makes sense to buy 12&#8211;18 months of high-end computing happiness for about $1000.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.229343-3318991</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:36:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
