<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Synthetic People Having a Real Conversation?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/227444/Synthetic-People-Having-a-Real-Conversation/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Synthetic People Having a Real Conversation?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:49:49 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:58:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Synthetic People Having a Real Conversation?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/227444/Synthetic-People-Having-a-Real-Conversation</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve created a promotional video for my website, which is currently listed as a Metafilter project called Conversus. The purpose of the video is to show how I can (with Google Translate) translate any conversation from most languages to most languages. I want to do this as part of the interview services I offer. In this video, I explain how this works by creating people using synthetic voice software, I give them names and I interview them. Since they are not real, am I being unethical if in a Twitter post, I say, &quot;Rodney, Svetlana, Ying, Niles, Maria, Bridget, Nanette &amp;amp; Hassan talk about being interviewed.&quot;?  I&apos;ve been a journalist for a long time and ethics is kind of hard wired in, so I&apos;m just checking a broader opinion base.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.227444</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:49:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CollectiveMind</dc:creator>
		
			<category>artificial_voice_technology</category>
		
			<category>synthetic_voice_technology</category>
		
			<category>interviewing</category>
		
			<category>interview</category>
		
			<category>Twitter</category>
		
			<category>ethics</category>
		
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quisp Lover</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/227444/Synthetic-People-Having-a-Real-Conversation#3291292</link>	
		<description>In the non-journalism world: clearly no ethics issues at all.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In the Twitter/Site Promotion world: what, are you KIDDING???&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But if you expect you might one day reenter journalism, you do need to weigh how this might affect future employers if they google you and your endeavors. But I doubt there ar many journalism operations remaining which are so stodgy as to reject someone for behaving unjournalistically while working outside journalism.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.227444-3291292</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:58:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Quisp Lover</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: LobsterMitten</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/227444/Synthetic-People-Having-a-Real-Conversation#3291338</link>	
		<description>If you&apos;re concerned, you can put an explanation on your page - &quot;The interviewees in my demo are fictional characters. I created their voices by doing such-and-such ... This demo shows how I can translate an interview with you in the languages of your choice...&quot; It is a nice little explanation of your process, and makes it clear for your readers that these aren&apos;t real people.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.227444-3291338</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:20:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LobsterMitten</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
