<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: What's the quickest way to code this data?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post What's the quickest way to code this data?</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:32:20 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:33:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: What&apos;s the quickest way to code this data?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data</link>	
		<description>I have an Excel spreadsheet with just over 3000 sentences in column A. I need to go through looking at each one and entering some data into columns B-F. The first thing I have to enter is whether the sentence is in the past tense or present tense. If it is past tense, I can ignore it and not have to enter anything in columns C-F. I just move on to the next sentence. Is it going to be quicker if I go through the whole spreadsheet filling out column B first (past/present) and then do a second pass to fill out the rest of the details for the present tense sentences, or quicker to do it all at once for each sentence? Or is it a wash? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The features in the other columns are each things that can take a second&apos;s thought to decide on, but no more than that. For example &quot;Is the subject a pronoun?&quot;; &quot;Is the verb a form of the verb&lt;em&gt; to be&lt;/em&gt;?&quot;, etc.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Any other tips for speeding this up would be appreciated. I&apos;ve already arranged my columns in optimum order, I think, through a bit of trial and error. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;(Incidentally, this needs to be extremely accurate, so I can&apos;t just program in an algorithm to reduce my sentences by weeding out anything with e.g. &quot;he&quot; followed by a word ending in &quot;-ed&quot;. I tried various more complicated versions of this - they all had too many errors - both false positives and false negatives. And the language is a non-standard dialect, conversational and colloquial, so I&apos;m not having luck with automating things like subject identification either. I&apos;d appreciate it if this doesn&apos;t turn into a discussion about that sort of automation and just assumes I&apos;m going to be doing it all by hand.)&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.226772</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:32:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lollusc</dc:creator>
		
			<category>dataentry</category>
		
			<category>datacoding</category>
		
			<category>excel</category>
		
			<category>speed</category>
		
			<category>tricks</category>
		
			<category>tips</category>
		
			<category>onepass</category>
		
			<category>twopass</category>
		
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lollusc</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data#3281493</link>	
		<description>(Oh, in case it&apos;s relevant, about 2/3 of the sentences are turning out to be past tense so far).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.226772-3281493</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:33:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lollusc</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: EndsOfInvention</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data#3281498</link>	
		<description>Definitely quicker to do just column B first. Set up two macros, one that enters &quot;past&quot; and moves down one cell, and one that enters &quot;present&quot; and moves down one cell. Assign them to easy-to-reach key combinations e.g. Ctrl+q and Ctrl+w. Then you can just quickly skim down entering the past/present text quickly.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Once you&apos;ve done that, use the Auto-filter to hide all the rows that have &quot;past&quot; in column B so it&apos;s easier to add the rest of the data.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.226772-3281498</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:37:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>EndsOfInvention</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Balonious Assault</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data#3281500</link>	
		<description>I think I&apos;d go through the whole sheet filling out column B, then do a quick filter to hide all the sentences that are past tense. I don&apos;t know if it would necessarily be any quicker that way, but it would give me a better picture of how much work was left to do, and I think that would help motivate me to stay on task and get done sooner.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.226772-3281500</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 06:38:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Balonious Assault</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jeather</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data#3281650</link>	
		<description>Having done similar stuff, the best way is to do one, switch over when you get bored enough, then switch back.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.226772-3281650</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:20:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeather</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: prenominal</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data#3281819</link>	
		<description>My initial response was going to be -- of course, fill all the B cells with &quot;0&quot; for past, then check each sentence and change &quot;0&quot; to &quot;1&quot; for present if required, sort/filter, and start the &apos;real&quot; work.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
However -- you&apos;ll have to read about 1000 sentences twice with this approach! What you&apos;re doing right now seems more efficient.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.226772-3281819</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:20:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prenominal</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: epanalepsis</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data#3282069</link>	
		<description>I would do each sentence at a time, because I think it is easier to do analysis when you aren&apos;t switching as often. But that may be my mind, YMMV. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;(I know you said you expect to do this manually, but if you know of a qualitative analysis software that can do this I would definitely be interested in it.)&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.226772-3282069</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:55:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>epanalepsis</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: lollusc</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data#3282302</link>	
		<description>Those of you who have said &quot;definitely quicker to do B first&quot;, what are you basing this on? Is it just instinct?  I feel like there should be more general principles that apply here and some definitive researched answer out there.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I love the macro idea, by the way. I was doing 0/1 manually, but the macro with quick keys will be faster.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.226772-3282302</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:40:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lollusc</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: vegetableagony</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/226772/Whats-the-quickest-way-to-code-this-data#3293623</link>	
		<description>Based on my experience with doing these sort of tasks (but without any data), I found that I can get very good at doing on task repetitively, and so by doing one task at a time my brain has to switch &quot;modes&quot; less frequently. This gain is enough for it to be worth rereading some of the sentences the second pass through when you do the other tasks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.226772-3293623</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:43:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>vegetableagony</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
