<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Peeking inside the Dewey Decimal System's history</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Peeking inside the Dewey Decimal System's history</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:57:09 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:45:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Peeking inside the Dewey Decimal System&apos;s history</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history</link>	
		<description>[Dewey Decimal Filter]  Looking for information about the Dewey Decimal System and its history of revisions.  In particular: When and why did Mormonism get moved from Dewey Decimal classification 290 (non-Christian religions) to 289 (other Christian denominations)? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Where can an ordinary citizen (a non-librarian) find info on the history of DDS changes?  (The Googles, they didn&apos;t help.)  Admittedly, peeking into the history of the DDS is pretty arcane, but... it  is possible, isn&apos;t it?  (I&apos;m asking for a friend) Note: Not interested in answers about Mormonism.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:57:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>exphysicist345</dc:creator>
		
			<category>library</category>
		
			<category>libraries</category>
		
			<category>deweydecimal</category>
		
			<category>deweydecimalhistory</category>
		
			<category>dewey</category>
		
			<category>decimal</category>
		
			<category>cataloging</category>
		
			<category>mormonism</category>
		
			<category>religion</category>
		
			<category>christianity</category>
		
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: couchdive</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3243853</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oclc.org/DEWEY/news/newsletter/211577_dewey_decimal_classification_news_June_2010_ALA.pdf&quot;&gt;This Dewey ALA newsletter&lt;/a&gt; says the The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee met In sept 2010 to discuss the 200&apos;s. And apparently in late 2011 the new addition of standards was released and in that, it makes the change.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
From my knowledge of LOC procedures.  Basically librarians petition for changes in the classification system and then the librarians fight over all this and then towards the end, the committee decides and then publishes the changes that are made in different classifications.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3243853</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:45:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>couchdive</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: gyusan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3243856</link>	
		<description>I cannot answer your main question, but for current things DDC, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://ddc.typepad.com/025431/&quot;&gt;025.431: The Dewey Blog&lt;/a&gt;. You could email some of the folks on the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee (I think that is their blog) and they could probably point you to an index of their &lt;em&gt;New and Revised Entries&lt;/em&gt; newsletters - or other sources that would register these sorts of changes. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you feel like diving in deep, there are several retrospective histories of DDC - the only one I&apos;ve ever looked at is Comaromi&apos;s &lt;em&gt;The eighteen editions of the Dewey Decimal Classification&lt;/em&gt; which is from the 70s.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3243856</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:46:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gyusan</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mareli</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3243863</link>	
		<description>You could also ask the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.loc.gov/rr/askalib/&quot;&gt;reference desk at the Library of Congress.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3243863</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:55:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mareli</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rabbitrabbit</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3243869</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m a cataloger with no time to research this, but I wanted to drop in to suggest a Google search term you might not have tried.  I notice you refer to DDS, when catalogers actually refer to it as DDC -- so if you tried DDS and not DDC, you might want to go back and try that in Google.  Also, for instance we would refer to the 23rd edition as DDC23 (no space usually).  Good luck.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3243869</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:01:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rabbitrabbit</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ReginaHart</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3243905</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m still searching for a definitive answer, but I can say that the change was made prior to 1972 per the following quote:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;On the other hand, when changed viewpoints and new knowledge required that arrangements be revised, revised they were; e.g. The Latter-Day Saints were transferred from 290 under non-Christian religions to 280 under Christian denominations...&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
From the 1972 publication &lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=6SuMGPi80f8C&amp;lpg=PA131&amp;ots=F2iCeRws7l&amp;dq=dewey%20decimal%20classification%20290%20latter-day%20saints&amp;pg=PA131#v=onepage&amp;q=dewey%20decimal%20classification%20290%20latter-day%20saints&amp;f=false&quot;&gt;Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science: Volume 7&lt;/a&gt; by Allen Kent, Harold Lancour.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3243905</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ReginaHart</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ReginaHart</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3243950</link>	
		<description>The &#160;&lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.org/stream/decimal12dewe#page/n91/mode/1up&quot;&gt;1927&lt;/a&gt; 12th edition of Dewey&apos;s &lt;b&gt;Decimal Classification and Relative Index&lt;/b&gt; classifies Mormonism under 289.3.&lt;br&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.org/stream/decimal10dewe#page/n562/mode/1up&quot;&gt;1922&lt;/a&gt; 11th edition assigns it to 298 and also helpfully refers the user to 173.2 (Polygamy).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I didn&apos;t read the text of the 1927 edition to see if it includes any commentary on changes, but it may.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3243950</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:13:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ReginaHart</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: teleri025</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3243970</link>	
		<description>I couldn&apos;t walk away from this one. According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.org/details/decimal12dewe&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; the DDC 12 published in 1927 was the edition that changed Mormonism from 298 (other religions) to 289.3.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3243970</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:30:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>teleri025</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: teleri025</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3243974</link>	
		<description>Three damn minutes late.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3243974</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:36:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>teleri025</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: unknowncommand</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3244038</link>	
		<description>You could ask at the Library of Congress, but they don&apos;t use the Dewey Decimal Classification (they use the Library of Congress Classification, conveniently enough), so I&apos;m not sure how much help they&apos;d be for this.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3244038</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:14:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>unknowncommand</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: exphysicist345</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3244073</link>	
		<description>Oddly enough, the people in command of the Dewey Decimal System, the honchos who decide what and when to make changes, are a department of.... the Library of Congress!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3244073</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 23:21:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>exphysicist345</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: dhartung</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3244093</link>	
		<description>I do not believe that conclusion is correct. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oclc.org/dewey/about/epc/&quot;&gt;Editorial Policy Committee&lt;/a&gt; is made up of representatives of various library organizations. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://staff.oclc.org/~dewey/dewey.htm&quot;&gt;owner of the DDC&lt;/a&gt; is the OCLC system, a private non-profit. The Library of Congress nominates a member of this committee but does not run it. The Decimal Classification Division of the Library of Congress is simply an office that implements the system and assigns numbers to works that are filed with the LoC.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3244093</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:43:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dhartung</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3244338</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;the honchos who decide what and when to make changes, are a department of.... the Library of Congress!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That is not true. They do determine Library of Congress Subject headings which seem like a similar thing but are, in fact quite different.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3244338</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:09:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: exphysicist345</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/224311/Peeking-inside-the-Dewey-Decimal-Systems-history#3244520</link>	
		<description>Thanks for the correction.  Not a librarian here, just an ordinary citizen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2012:site.224311-3244520</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:40:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>exphysicist345</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
