Moments after posting this, my husband got a call from the doctor, finally. He submitted the form and even talked to a doctor at the health insurance company (this is called peer to peer, maybe?). Anyway the bad news is the insurance company is still viewing his condition as Issue A when the doctor has clearly diagnosed him as Issue B, which is medically necessary. It looks unlikely that the insurance company will change its mind (they said their doctor is reviewing and will get back to us in 7-10 days) because it is in their best interest - as always - to not cover it.posted by mathowie at 12:45 PM on September 6, 2012
This is my first time dealing extensively with health insurance and health coverage and can I just say, if there is a more demoralizing and depressing thing than fighting with an insurance company, I haven't found it yet.
Thank you for your suggestions, everyone! I hope this question helps someone.
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
I'm assuming that getting a new prescription for the equivalent medication that would not require a prior auth is not something that would work for you? Typically if I write a script for something that needs a prior auth, the pharmacy calls me and I change it to the closest equivalent that the insurance co will cover. Then again I am an ER doc so I don't have to worry about faxing forms and all that.
I'm not aware of any penalty for paying full price yourself in any scenario, other than the pain of picturing the insurance company execs cackling evilly that they got out of paying what they should have had to pay. But I'll be interested to see if others have found any way around this.
posted by treehorn+bunny at 9:15 AM on September 6, 2012 [1 favorite]