<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: trac?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/21491/trac/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post trac?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:52:35 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:52:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: trac?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/21491/trac</link>	
		<description>Is anyone out there using &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edgewall.com/trac/&quot;&gt; this?&lt;/a&gt;   How do you like it?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.21491</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:33:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lilboo</dc:creator>
		
			<category>SCM</category>
		
			<category>bugtracking</category>
		
			<category>softwaredevelopment</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: jperkins</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/21491/trac#346887</link>	
		<description>We use trac extensively here at work and all love it. It&apos;s great, though I tend to stick to the command line svn tools for log histories and what not. I do love the rss feed of commit messages.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.21491-346887</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 14:52:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jperkins</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: clord</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/21491/trac#346898</link>	
		<description>I like it. The wiki integration is brilliant. You can use wiki commands in your SVN checkin notes, and you can refer to checkin notes and whatnot from other pages. I wish all project tools were like that. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The only problem I have is that the administration is difficult, and it is &apos;not trivial&apos; to set up for multiple projects.  (this may have changed in newer versions).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.21491-346898</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:09:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>clord</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jeb</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/21491/trac#346933</link>	
		<description>We really like it a lot for what we use it for, and it&apos;s easy on the eyes, but it is missing features that some people would really like (there&apos;s no sense of like time estimate/project velocity tracking IIRC).  It&apos;s general non-super-regimentedness makes it really useable, though, and consequently, more likely to actually get used.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.21491-346933</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:11:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeb</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cyrusdogstar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/21491/trac#347018</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s fuckin&apos; awesome. Makes keeping track of what I&apos;m doing super easy, it&apos;s a beautiful front-end for my Subversion repositories (I found Trac when looking for a web frontend shortly after switching to SVN from CVS) and the wiki is a natural place to store things which don&apos;t belong in text files or anywhere else, really. (I&apos;m still unsure whether to replace the standard INSTALL/README/etc text files as well, although I never really started using them before either...heh.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Plus the development community for it is very open, since they use Trac to develop itself, and I am on the mailing list which gets just enough traffic to be interesting but not too much to flood my inbox.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;clord&lt;/b&gt;, I have it set up for multiple projects (mod_python/Apache2/OSX) and I do not recall it being terrifically difficult. However, one of my main hobbies is futzing with Unix, so it may not have been super easy and I just considered that par for the course (e.g. I wanted something non-standard and was prepared to spend a half hour tinkering).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also to respond to your administration question, what specifically do you find hard to admin? I admit the trac-admin CLI tool isn&apos;t exactly quick but once you learn the few basic commands it&apos;s easy to use and/or script. And I&apos;ve figured out that overriding the few things trac-admin doesn&apos;t handle, and setting up better defaults for any new projects, is easily done by editing a single file in the Trac source code (and you don&apos;t really need to know Python to edit said file either, as it&apos;s just a big-ass database representation).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;jeb&lt;/b&gt;, I am fairly sure that the very issue of time estimation/time tracking is in either 0.9 or 1.0 and I&apos;ve seen it discussed a bit on the mailing list recently...if you haven&apos;t already, check the wiki/tickets to find the specifics as I don&apos;t recall.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.21491-347018</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:01:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cyrusdogstar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: bbrown</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/21491/trac#347276</link>	
		<description>If you&apos;re using CVS, there&apos;s also the original project that Trac was based on called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cvstrac.org/&quot;&gt;CVStrac&lt;/a&gt;. It&apos;s much more spartan, which I actually prefer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.21491-347276</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 04:45:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bbrown</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
