<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Login/Logout? Logon/Logoff?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Login/Logout? Logon/Logoff?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:17:31 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:17:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Login/Logout? Logon/Logoff?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff</link>	
		<description>What&apos;s the preferred terminology for entering and leaving the part of a website where you have to enter a username and password? Is it log in/log out or log on/log off? One word (login) or two (log in)?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:06:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joleta</dc:creator>
		
			<category>website</category>
		
			<category>login</category>
		
			<category>logout</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: majick</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff#333601</link>	
		<description>The terms I prefer to use are &quot;authenticate&quot; and &quot;end session,&quot; but I am not a copywriter.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423-333601</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:17:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>majick</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mmcg</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff#333603</link>	
		<description>Log in/out/off/on are all more or less interchangable. On/off has a stronger connotation of a network connection, like dialing into an ISP with a modem, whereas in/out is more of site specific type thing, like accessing a bank or message board, but I wouldn&apos;t be phased by hearing those switched around.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;d use two words if referring to the process. &apos;Login&apos; is sort of a unix-y way of describing the credentials used when accessing a system. As such, a login may be a user name, or a username/password pair.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423-333603</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:18:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mmcg</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff#333611</link>	
		<description>The latest edition of &lt;em&gt;Merriam-Webster&apos;s Collegiate Dictionary&lt;/em&gt; (the standard copy-editing reference) has &lt;em&gt;log on&lt;/em&gt; as the main entry and &lt;em&gt;log in&lt;/em&gt; defined as &quot;log on,&quot; so if you want a choice nobody can argue with, the former is it.  But both are OK.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The verb is always two words; &quot;to logon&quot; makes the user look illiterate.  (Note: as a cast-iron descriptivist, I don&apos;t think there&apos;s anything &lt;em&gt;wrong&lt;/em&gt; with misspellings, I&apos;m just describing the automatic reaction of most people who know the correct form.)  As for the noun, M-W has &lt;em&gt;log-on&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;log-in&lt;/em&gt; (hyphenated), but they&apos;ll probably evolve to one word (&lt;em&gt;logon, login&lt;/em&gt;) before the next edition comes out; again, if you want to be unimpeachably &quot;correct,&quot; use the hyphen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423-333611</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:25:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: grouse</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff#333612</link>	
		<description>Both Google and Yahoo use &quot;Sign in&quot; and &quot;Sign out&quot; which I think is friendlier and less technical somehow. And there&apos;s no question that it&apos;s not signin and signout.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423-333612</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:32:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>grouse</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: occhiblu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff#333647</link>	
		<description>Heh.  Unless you work for my company, in which &quot;signup&quot; becomes one word when IT is in charge.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Seconding languagehat.  No matter what the tech people tell you, the verb or command is two words:  Log in; Sign in; Log on.  If you then want to talk about the Login page, or the login name, you can smoosh it into one word (or hyphenate).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Note that if you are talking about those things, you pretty much always use &quot;login&quot;; I haven&apos;t heard anyone talk about a &quot;signin name.&quot;  That would be one reason to use &quot;log in&quot; as the command, since it keeps all your terminology simple.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423-333647</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:48:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>occhiblu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Joleta</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff#333672</link>	
		<description>This came up because I noticed that our company web site asks users to &quot;Log In&quot; but then &quot;Log Off,&quot; a mixed metaphor that cries out for change. I&apos;m running &quot;Sign in/Sign out&quot; past the powers-that-be this morning.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423-333672</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:16:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joleta</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: jmcmurry</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff#333685</link>	
		<description>FYI, Unix uses login / logout.  Windows uses log on / log off.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I think sites have started using &quot;sign in&quot; for authentication because many people erroneously believe the act of typing &quot;www.example.com&quot; in their web browser&apos;s location field constitutes &quot;logging on&quot; to the site.  Ugh.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423-333685</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmcmurry</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: LadyBonita</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff#333738</link>	
		<description>I, too, like Sign In and Sign Out.  No chance of mistaking the meaning of those!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423-333738</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:10:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LadyBonita</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Joleta</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20423/LoginLogout-LogonLogoff#333875</link>	
		<description>Ouch, jmcmurry! I&apos;m probably guilty of writing stuff like &quot;Log on to www.whatever.com to find out more...&quot; I&apos;ll watch that in the future.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20423-333875</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:36:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joleta</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
