Comments on: Best dead-tree atlas?

Question: Best dead-tree atlas?

selfnoise — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:47:23 -0800

What's the best dead-tree world atlas you can buy?

My wife wants one for her birthday. There seem to be a fair number for the taking. Any recommendations or personal favorites?

By: aramaic

aramaic — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:05:43 -0800

This one, IMHO.

By: frykitty

frykitty — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:12:23 -0800

Oooh...I second that. The Spousal Unit got one for his birthday, and it's amazing.

By: selfnoise

selfnoise — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:13:43 -0800

What about the National Geographic Atlas? Is the Times atlas worth the extra cost?

By: aramaic

aramaic — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 12:21:02 -0800

Is the Times atlas worth the extra cost?

Warning: I am a map dork. Having said that, yes I think the Times atlas is worth the extra cost. I'm primarily an antique map dork, but even so I appreciate the Times atlas....but again, I'm the sort of person who'll buy a map of Kent from 1420 without batting an eyelash.

By: Ethereal Bligh

Ethereal Bligh — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:06:24 -0800

The DK World Atlas. I have it and am very happy with it.

By: Pericles

Pericles — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:18:26 -0800

I was given an atlas that I found completely amazing: anything you can find that maps the world using the Peters Projection is worth buying.

By: mcwetboy

mcwetboy — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 13:20:52 -0800

This is a self-link and it's full of affiliate-program links besides, so apologies all around and warnings in advance, but this question came up on The Map Room back in January; the answers from my readers might be helpful (I was especially impressed with Jim's answer).

By: languagehat

languagehat — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:30:10 -0800

Is the Times atlas worth the extra cost?

Yes. The poster didn't ask about cost or anything else, just "What's the best dead-tree world atlas you can buy"—and that's the Times, no ifs, ands, or buts. When asked "what's the best dictionary" I hedge my responses with all sorts of qualifications, but for atlases there is a clear Best of the Best.

At mcwetboy's site (which I highly recommend; the guy is a total map maven) the answer he links to has two negative things to say about the Times atlas: it's expensive and it's big. Yup, and if either of those things puts you off, the other atlases recommended in this thread are excellent... but they're not the best. (EB, are you seriously claiming the DK is better than the Times? Have you used both?)

By: QIbHom

QIbHom — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:11:13 -0800

When I was in library school, I was told the Times was the best. I was also told the public would respect me, so consider the source.

Public libraries tend to have quite a few of them. You can go, and see which one you like best.

A small globe to go with it, and you've covered all four corners of the world.

By: IndigoJones

IndigoJones — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:19:14 -0800

And thinking ahead to next year....

By: Nelson

Nelson — Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:50:13 -0800

Don't try to save money on an atlas.

There are two excellent atlases being published now. The Times Atlas of the World is best if you want a political map with lots of cities, roads, county borders, etc. The DK Great World Atlas is best if you want a geography atlas, with lots of information on climate, geology, etc. Of the two I greatly prefer the DK Great World Atlas for browsing, because it's a lot more interesting. If I'm looking for some specific place the Times Atlas is better, but then I immediately open the same page in the DK to learn more about the area. Note: I'm basically repeating what Phil Greenspun wrote in two spot on mini-reviews of atlases on Amazon.

For something different, the DK Atlas of World History is very interesting. But it's much more a history book than an atlas.

By: selfnoise

selfnoise — Sun, 23 Oct 2005 17:53:23 -0800

Followup - I bought the new 11th edition of the Times Atlas for my wife. She loves it and is showing it off to everyone she knows. Thanks! I'll keep the other ones in mind for future gifts.