<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Remote Desktop Filter</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20279/Remote-Desktop-Filter/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Remote Desktop Filter</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:56:16 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:56:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Remote Desktop Filter</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20279/Remote-Desktop-Filter</link>	
		<description>Remote Desktop is great, but I need a little more flexibility... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; What I need to do is be able to connect to a machine that is concurrently running applications so I can monitor their status and possibly make changes. Basically, I want to &apos;log in&apos; to the current machine state rather than a fresh account view.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I realize I can probably do this with PC-Anywhere or a *VNC app, but I want to avoid that. The only thing I&apos;ve come across in my searching has been instructions on &apos;disconnecting&apos; rather than &apos;logging off&apos; a remote-desktop session so you can return to it where you left off.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The machine that runs the applications is on SBS2003, the connecting machines run Win2K. It has 3 applications running at all times that need to be checked and modified once at the end of the day. Running these applications initially in a remote-desktop session and using the &apos;disconnect&apos; option seems like a possibility - assuming it does indeed work and reconnecting will pull up the same state (as well as leaving the applications active rather than putting the whole session in network-limbo). It just seems like a real pain in the rear as a workaround. Any other ideas?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20279</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:44:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prostyle</dc:creator>
		
			<category>computers</category>
		
			<category>remotedesktop</category>
		
			<category>windows</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: seanyboy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20279/Remote-Desktop-Filter#331794</link>	
		<description>OK - You probably don&apos;t need to disconnect at all. On the SBS2003 machine create three .rdp file which log onto / create the relevant sessions. Initiate these as a scheduled item which runs at bootup, or create a service which initiates them. I haven&apos;t tried this, but I see no problem with it. To look in on the sessions, use Terminal Server Manager and the &quot;remote&quot; option.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20279-331794</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:56:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seanyboy</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: uncleozzy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20279/Remote-Desktop-Filter#331798</link>	
		<description>If SBS2003 is on the same platform as Win2003 (which I think it is), you should be able to connect directly to the console with the remote desktop connection client.  Just run &quot;mstsc /console&quot; to open up a session to the console, and close the connection (without logging out) when you&apos;re done.  It&apos;s just like being at the server.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You will have to install the new Remote Desktop client (instead of the old Terminal Server client) on the client machines, though, if it&apos;s not already there.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20279-331798</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 10:59:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>uncleozzy</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: prostyle</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/20279/Remote-Desktop-Filter#331800</link>	
		<description>Wow, you guys are great! Thanks for the lightning fast responses, uncleozzys solution worked like a charm!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.20279-331800</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:06:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prostyle</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
