Cross-platform backup solutions for Mac/Windows/Linux...which is more reliable?
June 22, 2005 12:23 PM
Subscribe
I'm currently running Retrospect Server 5 on a Mac OS X box. It's backing up the following clients: 2 Windows 2003 servers, a Windows 2000 server, 2 Mac OS X 10.2 Servers, a few Mac OS X Panther clients, and 2 linus boxes. Backups are done to external hard drives as well as to a VXA tape changer.
The Mac Servers and clients will soon be upgraded to Tiger, so I'm going to need to upgrade Retrospect. However, Retrospect is somewhat flaky at times, and I've heard about some reliability issues with Retrospect 6.
I'm considering switching to BRU Server by the Tolis Group. I've heard lots of good things.
My question is, does anyone have any actual experience with similar setups for these two backup solutions and which one should I go with? Or maybe is there a better backup solution in the same price range I should be considering?
posted by edjusted to computers & internet (6 comments total)
At this point, I'd stick with Retrospect 6. It is a much more solid solution than Retro 5, although there are still some glitches. BRU is just not ready for the mainstream until they get their GUI problems worked out. It's useable (sometimes), but you have to spend a lot of time with it.
posted by pmbuko at 12:37 PM on June 22, 2005