<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: What is tat?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post What is tat?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 13:44:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 13:44:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: What is tat?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat</link>	
		<description>Every so often, when reading online discussions between Catholics and/or Anglicans, I see people mentioning something called &quot;tat&quot;. What the heck is tat? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Putting the word in context it seems to refer to a certain style of worship, one that is a little over the top, or to something that happens during worship. I am not at all sure about this though. Googling does nothing except bring up a few instances of folks using the word but not defining it and a whole lot of misspellings of the word &quot;that&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 13:35:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LeeJay</dc:creator>
		
			<category>religion</category>
		
			<category>catholics</category>
		
			<category>anglicans</category>
		
			<category>worship</category>
		
			<category>terms</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: purephase</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318190</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m not sure if it is what you&apos;re looking for but Wikipedia has a few &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tat&quot;&gt;suggestions&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318190</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 13:44:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>purephase</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: fixedgear</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318193</link>	
		<description>It is something you can exchange &quot;tit&quot; for.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318193</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 13:57:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fixedgear</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Smart Dalek</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318198</link>	
		<description>There was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/tatian.html&quot;&gt;Gnostic scholar&lt;/a&gt; in 2nd Century times named &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14464b.htm&quot;&gt;Tatian&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Christian tat&quot;, however, is british slang for spiritual tchotchkes, such as Virgin Mary night lights and &quot;Jesus is My Homeboy&quot; t-shirts. The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.users.surfaid.org/~bfmyouth/tatomondo2.html&quot;&gt;tatomondo&lt;/a&gt;  section of an Anglican website explains things in greater detail.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There are rumors of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joshuaproject.net/peopctry.php?rop3=106963&amp;rog3=AJ&quot;&gt;linguistic Christian Tat&lt;/a&gt;, which would be a variation of Iranian dialect. &lt;br&gt;
Any evidence of such, however, appears to be unverified.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318198</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 14:26:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Smart Dalek</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: interrobang</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318199</link>	
		<description>If Smart Dalek&apos;s answer isn&apos;t right, you could always consider logging into said discussion boards and asking the posters themselves.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318199</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 14:27:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>interrobang</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: LeeJay</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318201</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;Christian tat&quot;, however, is british slang for spiritual tchotchkes, such as Virgin Mary night lights and &quot;Jesus is My Homeboy&quot; t-shirts. The tatomondo section of an Anglican website explains things in greater detail.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Thank you Smart Dalek. That fits perfectly with how I&apos;ve seen it used.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318201</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 14:30:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LeeJay</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ubersturm</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318202</link>	
		<description>I doubt it&apos;s something that happens during the mass [unless it&apos;s some sort of regional slang] - never learned about it in years and years of religion classes at Catholic schools.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Some googling brings up &lt;a href=http://bettnet.dyndns.org/blog/forum/threads.php?id=1300_0_4_0_C&gt;Talking  About Touching&lt;/a&gt;, a controversial program implemented in the Boston Diocese to teach kids about avoiding sexual abuse.  From your description, though, it doesn&apos;t sound like that&apos;s what you&apos;re encountering.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318202</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 14:30:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ubersturm</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: veedubya</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318204</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve never heard it referred to in the context of religion, but the word &apos;tat&apos; is commonly used here in the UK to refer to small, cheap, and usually tasteless, items.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318204</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 14:43:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>veedubya</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Johnny Assay</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318205</link>	
		<description>This seems to have been asked &amp;amp; answered already, but for the record, the OED has as a definition of &lt;i&gt;tat&lt;/i&gt; &quot;5b.  Rubbish, junk, worthless goods.&quot;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318205</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 14:43:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Assay</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: andrew cooke</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318207</link>	
		<description>just in case it&apos;s not completely clear, there is no religious conotation at all to the word &lt;em&gt;tat&lt;/em&gt; - it&apos;s just junk.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318207</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 15:27:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andrew cooke</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: LeeJay</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318215</link>	
		<description>Thanks everyone for the help. The discussions I saw were mostly UK based so their use of &quot;tat&quot; to describe religious bric-a-brac now makes sense. And I have a new word to describe the kitschy, campy crap I love.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318215</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 15:57:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LeeJay</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Flitcraft</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318238</link>	
		<description>Leejay, Smart Dalek is not correct in this instance. Religious tat in the sense you are probably seeing it discussed by Anglicans is absolutely not &quot;slang for spiritual tchotchkes&quot;.  Tchtochkes are tat &lt;em&gt;per se&lt;/em&gt; - tat as in the kind of stuff you find in seedy souvenir stalls but when an Anglocatholic writes about seeing &apos;superb tat&apos; at a church he/she does not mean that the church was tasteless or kitsch but the very reverse - that they had excellent elaborate vestments and ecclesiastical paraphernalia suitable for High Anglican worship. Hence a &apos;tat-box&apos; is slang for a certain sort of High anglican church and &apos;tat queens&apos; are priests or servers who like dressing up in elaborate vestments. Here&apos;s a thread from &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=11;t=000494&quot;&gt;Ship of Fools&lt;/a&gt; which has some discussion of tat on it - and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:JBFeKge52bIJ:forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/UBB/ultimatebb.cgi%3Fubb%3Dget_topic%3Bf%3D6%3Bt%3D000194+tat+site:ship-of-fools.com&amp;hl=en&amp;start=3&amp;client=firefox-a&quot;&gt; few&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.ship-of-fools.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=11;t=000083&quot;&gt; others&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ordinarily religious tat means the kind of tchtochkes you mention but in the Anglican context the word has been appropriated ironically to mean things considered to be very tasteful and important in worship - though it&apos;s partly self-deprecating (people who don&apos;t like that tradition, might call it kitsch or camp as a term of abuse). However unless they are explicitly discussing Virgin Mary snowglobes and glow in the dark rosaries, you should assume that they actually mean vestments and accoutrements used in an Anglican church which prefers a Catholic style of worship.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318238</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 16:40:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Flitcraft</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: languagehat</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318247</link>	
		<description>Once again, the &quot;best answer&quot; tag is over-hastily applied (assuming Flitcraft knows whereof she speaks, which I presume she does, because she joined MeFi at almost the exact same time I did).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
From Smart Dalek&apos;s final link:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Only about 1% of the Mussulman Tat in Azerbaijan are Christian.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That is an extremely odd statement.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318247</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 17:11:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>languagehat</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: LeeJay</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318267</link>	
		<description>Flitcraft, thanks. That makes even more sense.  I believe that some of the places I have seen it used were talking about tat in the sense of Smart Dalek&apos;s kitschy stuff but the Anglicans must have been talking about it the way you described. Thanks for the in-depth info.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318267</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 17:57:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LeeJay</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: five fresh fish</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318280</link>	
		<description>So is &quot;tit-for-tat&quot; somehow related to this definition of &quot;tat&quot;?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(does it translate to &quot;junk-for-junk&quot;?)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318280</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 18:20:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>five fresh fish</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Goofyy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318368</link>	
		<description>Sounds to me like British for what we call, in America, &quot;High Church&quot;. I&apos;ve heard it said that the Episcopalian (Anglican) are more &quot;high church&quot; than the Catholics anymore. When I was taught the term, the main indicator of high church was the use of lots of incense, but of course, vestments go along with that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318368</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 21:47:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Goofyy</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: IndigoJones</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/19321/What-is-tat#318646</link>	
		<description>See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessballs.com/clichesorigins.htm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for tit for tat (sorry, don&apos;t know how to spring to the middle of a web page. Probably should put that up as question.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.19321-318646</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 14:38:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndigoJones</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
