Pictures. People. Time.
May 17, 2011 12:13 PM Subscribe
I have: a bunch of selections from NYPL's Picture Collection; a group of artist-types who are gung-ho for basically anything; and a maximum of one hour. I'm meant to be leading some sort of physical activity. What now?
This is a group of 6-10 Theater People, although the event is not necessarily focused on theater or acting.
As part of this (recurring) gathering, I volunteered to lead the section generically called "Body-Type Learning", which is a way of saying I should be leading some sort of activity that's physical practice, rather than theory (as opposed to Brain-Type Learning, which is the other major segment). It doesn't need to be a workout, it just needs to not be stationary. Not everyone has to be moving all the time.
Thinking to use them as inspiration for my activity, I gathered a selection of images from the Picture Collection. Some are photographs of one person, some are photographs of pairs, some are paintings of groups, some are abstracts of something-or-other, some are photos of dogs and nebulae (not together).
It turns out that my idea basically fizzled at "Get pictures". I assumed that I would think of something to do with them that would be cool, but I'm at a total loss, and running short of time.
This event begins at 7pm EDT.
Any ideas you have will be greatly appreciated.
posted by davidjmcgee to grab bag (6 answers total) 1 user marked this as a favorite
If you don't need there to be any real educational aspect, I have an idea that may not involve the pictures at all: something we did in my "movement" class one year in the acting conservatory, that was AWESOME: play baseball. Imaginary baseball.
No, go with me a second.
It's just like baseball, except the bases are imaginary, as is the bat, as is the ball. Divide them into teams; you are the umpire. In your role as umpire, you are the one that calls out whether the pitch that the "pitcher" pitches is a hit, a strike, or a ball (this is something you decide wholly on the spur of the moment). Based on your calls, the others play out each person's turn at bat; you also ascertain whether a person has been tagged out, whether the people in the field catch a ball, etc.
I know this sounds completely ridiculous, but it is eerie how much my acting class got into it. I noticed that at one point while I was waiting my "turn at bat" I was standing in a strange posture, with my arms stretched out from my shoulders and my wrists loose so my hands hung down; I saw myself in the studio mirror and wondered what I was doing, then remembered that when I played softball at age nine, I used to stand exactly like that when I lay the bat across my shoulders and draped my hands over the ends. I had completely forgotten that gesture for ten years, and suddenly found myself doing it again almost by instinct. I then noticed that my classmates were really getting into this imaginary game -- full-powered swings at the "ball", headlong dashes for the "bases", and even a full-on argument over a call which was based on one person having "seen" the ball in another person's hand.
I really don't get what the educational component of that was, but it sure as hell taught me a lot about the power of visualization during performance, because if you can endow the very air with enough substance to argue with someone over it, then that teaches you a lot about what your mind is capable of. I also acknowledge that may be hard to do if you only have six people, but if you have ten, give it a shot.
posted by EmpressCallipygos at 12:46 PM on May 17, 2011 [1 favorite]