<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Are you getting a lot of stock-related spam on Gmail lately?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Are you getting a lot of stock-related spam on Gmail lately?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 04:45:11 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 04:45:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Are you getting a lot of stock-related spam on Gmail lately?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately</link>	
		<description>In the last couple of weeks Gmail&apos;s normally-astute spam filtering has totally given up the ghost in one specific area: stock spam. It seems like every single stock spam slips past the filter and ends up in my inbox. At the moment every other time I get a new email it comes with a subject like &quot;Leading auth0rity On l0w priced st0cks&quot;. Anyone else having the same issue? Has Gmail&apos;s spam filter started to show cracks?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 04:35:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LondonYank</dc:creator>
		
			<category>spam</category>
		
			<category>gmail</category>
		
			<category>email</category>
		
			<category>filter</category>
		
			<category>stock</category>
		
			<category>scam</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: NeonSurge</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292268</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s not just Gmail. I&apos;ve been flooded with these bloody stock spams on all my email accounts over the past couple of weeks (including my work account which is &quot;protected&quot; by two different filters). Maybe some spammer has discovered a new method of bypassing filters...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292268</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 04:45:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NeonSurge</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: sebas</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292281</link>	
		<description>Yeah, all these &apos;An exciting cOmpany f0r investOrs&apos; emails are invading my work email as well. It is kind of hard to filter out I assume. They mention a lot of business buzz words like VoIP, which are very valid terms in a lot of my emails.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292281</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 05:25:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sebas</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: smackfu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292326</link>	
		<description>Seeing it here too.  Today it&apos;s nine copies of: &lt;i&gt;&quot;Stock Watch Alert&quot; this morning are Wysak Petroleum (WYSK), Key Energy Services, Inc. (Pink Sheets: KEGS), Medify So|utions (MFYS), Sequoia Interests Corporation (SQNC).&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292326</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:15:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smackfu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: sbutler</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292329</link>	
		<description>Count me in also. It&apos;s been getting by my SpamAssassin install something fierce lately. I figured I had just screwed up the configuration... I guess not.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292329</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:21:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sbutler</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: gi_wrighty</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292334</link>	
		<description>I think it&apos;s because they&apos;re sending multi-part mime emails, with the plain-text part being something benign, most likely copied from a news site, and the html part being the actual ad.  The spam filter passes the email based on the plain-text part but your mail client displays the html part.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292334</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:28:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gi_wrighty</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: blag</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292336</link>	
		<description>Yes, same here. In fairness, I can imagine that it would be difficult to spot these via heuristic scanning - they&apos;re very long and don&apos;t contain any of the normal &apos;red flag&apos; attributes - embedded images, URLs with strings of digits etc. Gmail&apos;s spam filter is doing better than SpamAssassin, though - any ideas why?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I guess the purpose of these is to artificially inflate stock value - is there not a remedy under SEC (?) regulations?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
On preview: gi_wrighty: aaah. clever. sortof.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292336</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:30:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blag</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: NeonSurge</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292344</link>	
		<description>There&apos;s no HTML in any of the spams I&apos;ve received. They all seem to follow the same basic pattern in replacing some (but not all) lowercase &quot;L&quot;s with the pipe symbol:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;em&gt;The Oi| and Gas Advisory Now that Oi| and Gas has entered a |ong-term bu|| market, our specia|ty in pinpointing the hottest companies of the few remaining underva|ued energy plays has produced soaring returns. Emerson Oi| and Gas (EOGI) is an energy developer in the US &quot;Oi| Be|t&quot;&lt;br&gt;
and in Canada&apos;s most high|y coveted reservoirs with generating potential of Mi||ions per week.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292344</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NeonSurge</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: tdismukes</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292416</link>	
		<description>I just started getting these within the last week, at an email address where I&apos;ve never gotten spam before.  Now I&apos;m getting a dozen or more per day.  They&apos;re pretty obviously all from the same source, even though the return addresses are forged.  Spam Assassin is marking most of them, but some still get through.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I kind of wonder what the actual purpose is, aside from harassing random people.  Does anyone actually pay attention to these, other than to delete them?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292416</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:50:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tdismukes</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: suitcase</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292452</link>	
		<description>http://www.sec.gov/answers/pumpdump.htm</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292452</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:18:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>suitcase</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: scazza</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292648</link>	
		<description>I use Mutt and Spam Assassin for my email and have been getting 5-10 stock spams a day.  Most of them haven&apos;t even altered their spellings to include numbers in the words, and everything seems to get through.  I assume that Gmail and Spam Assassin alike are working on this.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292648</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:40:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scazza</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mosch</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292793</link>	
		<description>This type of thing is extremely common.  The smarter spammers (thankfully there aren&apos;t many) tune their messages to avoid detection by common spam filters.  Once they succeed, you&apos;ll tend to get a large number of these particular messages until the spam filters then adapt.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Gmail really doesn&apos;t do anything revolutionary when it comes to spam filtering, at least is as detectable in a black box analysis of the service.  It&apos;s good work, but the fact remains that stopping spam is not a simple matter, and that real messages flagged as spam are a far more serious problem than one or two spams a day, flagged as real.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now if only I could stop the stock scam faxes, I&apos;d be a happy man.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292793</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:23:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mosch</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: LondonYank</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17461/Are-you-getting-a-lot-of-stockrelated-spam-on-Gmail-lately#292813</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I kind of wonder what the actual purpose is, aside from harassing random people. Does anyone actually pay attention to these, other than to delete them?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Can&apos;t that be said of pretty much all spam? I mean, who actually goes for the P3n1s enlargement offers or 0nl1ne Ph@arm@cy links?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17461-292813</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2005 01:56:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LondonYank</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
