<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: USB 2.0 on older hardware</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17189/USB-20-on-older-hardware/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post USB 2.0 on older hardware</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:58:27 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:58:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: USB 2.0 on older hardware</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17189/USB-20-on-older-hardware</link>	
		<description>How do I get USB 2.0 to work on my ageing PC? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; My PC is getting on a bit these days. It has a USB 1.1 port which works fine. I recently bought a PCI USB 2.0 card, but no USB 2.0 devices seem to be recognised. The card itself I think is fine, since my digital camera can use one of the sockets (it&apos;s a 1.1 device). My iRiver doesn&apos;t seem to be at fault, since I can connect it with one of the existing  1.1 sockets. I don&apos;t think it&apos;s an operating system/software issue, as I&apos;m seeing the same behaviour in both Windows 98SE and linux. (In both cases, a hardware probe recognises that there is a USB 2.0 card connected.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So what else could it be? Is it possible that it&apos;s a motherboard or BIOS issue? In which case, what can I do about it? The m/b is a VIA K7T266.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17189</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:54:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>salmacis</dc:creator>
		
			<category>PCI</category>
		
			<category>USB2.0</category>
		
			<category>VIA</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: mkultra</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17189/USB-20-on-older-hardware#288529</link>	
		<description>USB 2.0 is not natively supported by 98 or 98SE. You&apos;ll need to upgrade to 2000/XP or see if your card vendor offers their own drivers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linux-usb.org/usb2.html&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is some info on USB 2.0 support (or not) in Linux.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17189-288529</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:58:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mkultra</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: salmacis</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17189/USB-20-on-older-hardware#288546</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t think it&apos;s a driver issue, since USB 2.0 &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; supported in linux (I&apos;m using the 2.6 kernel with SuSE 9.1). In addition, both the card and the hard disk cradle came with driver disks for Win 98SE.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17189-288546</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:19:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>salmacis</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: bh</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17189/USB-20-on-older-hardware#288614</link>	
		<description>Have you tried watching the log (in linux) while connecting a device?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17189-288614</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:03:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bh</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: salmacis</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17189/USB-20-on-older-hardware#288743</link>	
		<description>Yup..&lt;pre&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Apr  6 22:03:35 linux kernel: usb 4-5: new high speed USB device using address 2&lt;br&gt;
Apr  6 22:03:35 linux kernel: usb 4-5: device not accepting address 2, error -71&lt;br&gt;
Apr  6 22:03:35 linux kernel: usb 4-5: new high speed USB device using address 3&lt;br&gt;
Apr  6 22:03:36 linux kernel: usb 4-5: device not accepting address 3, error -71&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/pre&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17189-288743</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:00:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>salmacis</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: angry modem</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17189/USB-20-on-older-hardware#288757</link>	
		<description>Was this a cheap card?  Cheap cards of all sorts sometimes exhibit weird behavior.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17189-288757</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:25:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>angry modem</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: bh</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17189/USB-20-on-older-hardware#288884</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m a bit short on time, but a bit of googling suggested:&lt;br&gt;
Most likely:&lt;br&gt;
Plug in the iriver.  It might be a power issue.  USB 2 takes more power, or thinks it does.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Less likely:&lt;br&gt;
Pass pci=noacpi to the kernel.  Less likely because this is Linux only.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17189-288884</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:13:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bh</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: salmacis</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17189/USB-20-on-older-hardware#288990</link>	
		<description>noacpi is the default. It&apos;s not power, since the hard drive cradle has it&apos;s own power supply.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17189-288990</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 00:53:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>salmacis</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
