<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Video Work</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17184/Video-Work/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Video Work</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:32:04 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:32:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Video Work</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17184/Video-Work</link>	
		<description>Want to do start doing some video work, curious what are my best options for some quick &quot;post-to-web&quot; type videos, as well as being able to store them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Problem 1: Camera&lt;br&gt;
Do I do the camcorder thing, which I don&apos;t really like DV, or go with a camera such as a DSC-M1 from Sony, which records in MPEG4 30 fps 640x480 on a memory stick.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Problem 2: Software&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve looked at Adobe Premier Elements. It looks good, but I don&apos;t think it would import MPEG4 if I took that route. I&apos;ve looked at purchasing a mac mini or something like that with a superdrive, and using iMovie, not sure if that&apos;s worth the cost there, or not.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17184</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:07:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benjh</dc:creator>
		
			<category>movie</category>
		
			<category>imovie</category>
		
			<category>mpeg4</category>
		
			<category>apple</category>
		
			<category>sony</category>
		
			<category>camera</category>
		
			<category>video</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: jeremias</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17184/Video-Work#288510</link>	
		<description>Why don&apos;t you like DV? It&apos;s the easiest way to edit. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
RE: MPEG4, I wouldn&apos;t recommend it. At 640x480 you wouldn&apos;t want to output to tv at that resolution also: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Proprietary MPEG-4 videos require an MPEG 4 CODEC or Sony&apos;s software to view and convert&quot;. Screw that.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Premiere Elements is a good choice for the PC: it&apos;s cheap and can do most of what a more expensive program like Premiere Pro can do. It can also output directly to DVD w/menus.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17184-288510</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:32:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeremias</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: benjh</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17184/Video-Work#288516</link>	
		<description>The reason I don&apos;t like DV is the fact that with something like MPEG4, my thought was that I could just drag and drop the video file. With DV, I have to capture in real time, which frustrates me a little. (Yes, I know I&apos;m impatient.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17184-288516</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:38:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>benjh</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: aaronh</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17184/Video-Work#288565</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s not really faster.  MPEG 4 uses interframe compression and can&apos;t easily be edited.  In fact, when given things in such a format, the first thing you usually have to do is convert them to DV so they are manageable.  That process alone is longer than capturing.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Capturing DV is quite painless.  You just set it to begin and eat a snack.  It&apos;s not like you have to baby sit while it happens.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As for editing software, I&apos;m not familiar with Premiere Elements but I highly recommend Sony Vegas.  Like Premiere Pro, there is a &quot;lite&quot; version called &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.com/Products/ShowProduct.asp?PID=932&quot;&gt;Vegas Movie Studio&lt;/a&gt; that can also output DVDs and the like.  It&apos;s $99 ($49 if you&apos;re a student).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17184-288565</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 08:45:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>aaronh</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Tubes</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17184/Video-Work#288584</link>	
		<description>Another vote for &lt;strong&gt;Vegas&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;amp; Vegas lite. I bought Vegas after a lot of comparative research, and trials of demo versions, and I&apos;ve never regretted it. Very capable, easy to use, pleasant interface, and even on my older PC it runs rock-solid, where some competitors were known to be crash-prone. To just get started I&apos;d suggest a secondhand DV camcorder and Vegas Movie Studio. Either it will be all you ever want, or it will help you learn what more you need.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17184-288584</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tubes</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: cillit bang</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/17184/Video-Work#288612</link>	
		<description>The latest version iMovie has no problem editing videos made on digital cameras, and the quality isn&apos;t the big a deal if they&apos;re going on the web.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The real problem you&apos;ll have is that they aren&apos;t really suited to shooting video - they&apos;re hard to hold still for long periods because of their shape, they don&apos;t have the right kinds of controls, and they usually only have a short zoom lens (and the ones I&apos;ve used don&apos;t let you adjust the zoom while recording). Also the audio quality is usually awful and you probably can&apos;t hook up an external mic.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.17184-288612</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:02:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cillit bang</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
