Subscribethe use of a pseudonym should not be allowed to act as a means of escaping responsibility.
The certifier may collect personal data only directly from the affected person and only insofar as necessary for the purposes of a certificate. Collecting data from a third party is only permissible if the person affected gives his consent. Data may only be used for purposes other than those described in sentence 1 if this law or another legal provision so permits or the person affected has given his consent.
In the case of a signature key owner using a pseudonym, the certifier shall transmit data concerning his identity upon request of the proper authorities, insofar as this is necessary to prosecute crimes or misdemeanors, to protect against dangers for the public safety or public order, or to fulfill the legal duties of the constitutional protection authorities of the federal government and the federal states, the federal security service, the military security service or the criminal customs authorities. Such information shall be documented.
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
FindLaw had nothing on whether someone can find a pseudonym. I've only taken an Intellectual Property class and a Business Law Intro class, but I haven't heard of anything like pseudonym protection. Note that journalists might lose some of their anonymous-source confidentiality privileges if current judicial trends continue.
posted by NickDouglas at 5:55 PM on March 8, 2005