Is anyone here an "Internet Marketer" or has anyone here got any analysis/insight/opinions/comments/views they would like to share on "Internet Marketing"?
I'm current researching the sector of "Internet Marketing", which seems to be significant, but frequently overlooked in mainstream media. I will define what I mean by "Internet Marketing" below.
I'd like some different viewpoints, analysis, insight and opinion on "Internet Marketing" itself.
By "Internet Marketing" I mean the products and services of people like
Mike Filsaime,
Yanik Silver and
Anik Signal and
Kelly Felix,
Jim Davis,
Donna Fox.
Many of these people run "Make money online" (or similar) schemes, and essentially they are "list builders" (using email marketing using software/autoresponders like
Aweber), "affiliate marketers" (usually
clickbank), "niche marketers" (content) and "ebook marketers" (content). These people do have legitimate incomes and legitimate companies.
Their products are almost sold in sales-letter format with opt-ins and up sells/subscriptions/members sites/"coaching" schemes. They use terms like "JV" for Joint Venture. Almost everyone has come across one before.
Where does it come from, and why are there conventions within the sector which are so rigidly followed? Is it really because they are so successful? They seem to follow conventions of a traditional sales letter and use traditional textbook sales and marketing methods, especially when it comes to the language used (creating a sense of urgency. Not all offer digital ebook products, many offer members subscription sites or even physical products.
It is very hard to find an unbias and impartial analysis of the sector and what goes on in it. Searching the internet simply returns sites trying to sell "internet marketing tips" and "internet marketing information" in the form of email newsletters or ebooks. It is hard to find the real success stories even though there is real success . It people do make a 6-figure income in this sector though it is hard to find a simple overview of the sector from an outside perspective.
Any help, as I stated above would be much appreciated. This could include analysis/insight/opinions/comments/views or links to impartial resources on the subject/sector itself.
Many of the rigid conventions you mention do seem to come from direct-mail copywriting, with some online buzzwords and acronyms added. The fact that there are so many conventions is probably related to the way that IM systems are advertised as "blueprints" that you should follow point by point to achieve the success you always dreamed of, without actually having to figure out anything for yourself. There's a strong element of cribbing from others' business plans and materials and not changing anything without testing it or hearing from someone who has.
Not to mention that some people who offer affiliate programs for their products also give sales materials to their affiliates, who copy them and maybe change a thing or two.
So you see an endless parade of identical-looking direct-mail-style copywriting, always with a combination of red text, yellow highlighting, and underlining in the headline.
Not *everybody* does it that way, of course. The Chris Guillebeaus (for instance) of the world manage to sell information products using some DM techniques, but attractive web design.
Given that from what I've heard, long-copy sales letters do work, sometimes I think the difference between the cheesy ones and the respectable ones, scammy offers aside, is typography...
As far as income claims go, they can be faked easily (in any "screen shot" showing revenues, check to see if the typefaces match... though if the faker is any good it'll be undetectable.) The FTC recently started cracking down on income claims in IM sales letters; maybe you've heard of that?
I've written a lot with no links... the biggest forum I'm watching right now is Warrior Forum. You'll see everything you've described and more there.
posted by pengale at 5:20 PM on May 17, 2010