<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Broadcast Flag Specs</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/15276/Broadcast-Flag-Specs/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Broadcast Flag Specs</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:35:49 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:35:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Broadcast Flag Specs</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/15276/Broadcast-Flag-Specs</link>	
		<description>Can someone please direct me to a technical specification of the US FCC-mandated Broadcast Flag? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I&apos;m thinking that although new receivers will be unable to ignore the broadcast flag, it should be possible to build a digital &quot;filter&quot; that you hook up between the receiver and the datasource that flips the bit on the Broadcast Flag.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.15276</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:07:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Netzapper</dc:creator>
		
			<category>FCC</category>
		
			<category>specification</category>
		
			<category>broadcast</category>
		
			<category>flag</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: smackfu</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/15276/Broadcast-Flag-Specs#262573</link>	
		<description>Take a look at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/HDTV/bpdg-report/pdf/BPDG_Report.pdf&quot;&gt;Broadcast Protection Discussion Group (BPDG) final report&lt;/a&gt;.  (All links are to PDFs.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;4.2 The specific &quot;Broadcast Flag&quot; to be used for this purpose is the Redistribution Control descriptor set forth in ATSC Standard A/65A: Program and System Information Protocol for Terrestrial Broadcast and Cable, 31 May 2000, Amendment 3, 6 February 2002.&lt;/blockquote&gt;That standard is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atsc.org/standards/a_65b.pdf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, although now the amendment is incorporated in version 65B.  You want Section 6.9.13 Redistribution Control (RC) Descriptor.  I&apos;m not certain they&apos;ve yet specified what the actual values of the descriptor would be for protected content.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The &lt;a href=&quot;http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-273A1.pdf&quot;&gt;FCC order&lt;/a&gt; on this is probably worth reading too, since it has a lot of discussion of the issues involved.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.15276-262573</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:35:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>smackfu</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: 31d1</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/15276/Broadcast-Flag-Specs#262590</link>	
		<description>The EFF has &lt;a href=http://www.eff.org/IP/Video/HDTV/&gt;some stuff&lt;/a&gt; worth reading. We have till July 1st to get HDTV tuner cards (I personally think July 4th would have been more fitting).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.15276-262590</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:45:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>31d1</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: mathowie</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/15276/Broadcast-Flag-Specs#262650</link>	
		<description>For those that want an intro to the issues, there&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000717032165/&quot;&gt;this new review of it&lt;/a&gt; at Engadget.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.15276-262650</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:29:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
