<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Please recommend a free spam filter for Outlook Express</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Please recommend a free spam filter for Outlook Express</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:11:15 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:11:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Please recommend a free spam filter for Outlook Express</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express</link>	
		<description>What is a decent, free spam filter for Outlook Express? Suggestions that I use another mail client are not necessary.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:06:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pieoverdone</dc:creator>
		
			<category>email</category>
		
			<category>OutlookExpress</category>
		
			<category>spam</category>
		
			<category>filter</category>
		
			<category>blocker</category>
		
			<category>antispam</category>
		
			<category>free</category>
		
			<category>software</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: skwm</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254750</link>	
		<description>I use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), which will work with any POP based mail system.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254750</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:11:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>skwm</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: luyon</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254755</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve found that &lt;a href=&quot;http://spambayes.sourceforge.net&quot;&gt;SpamBayes&lt;/a&gt; works wonders.  Errr, and after writing this I see it only works with Outlook, not Outlook Express.  Well the &lt;a href=&quot;http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/related.html&quot;&gt;related projects page&lt;/a&gt; lists alternatives, including POPFile.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254755</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:20:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luyon</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: orthogonality</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254760</link>	
		<description>SpamBayes is excellent, but only has a plug-in for Outlook (not Outlook Express, which is an entirely different application with a confusingly similar name).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But SpamBayes can work with any mail client if it&apos;s run as a proxy server. Of course, you need to make sure you have the proxy server running (or else you get no mail, and wonder, &quot;why am I getting no mail&quot;) and you have to change your account settings in Outlook Express to use the proxy server, and give the proxy server your actual mail server&apos;s address.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254760</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:31:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>orthogonality</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Kirth Gerson</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254774</link>	
		<description>I used to use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mailwasher.net/index.php&quot;&gt;Mailwasher&lt;/a&gt;.  It is a separate program, not a plug-in, but it does a good job and is free. Since I stopped using OE, I no longer need it (sorry).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254774</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:04:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kirth Gerson</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: brool</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254784</link>	
		<description>Another vote for POPFile.  It&apos;s uncannily accurate, after being trained.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254784</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:30:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brool</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: maurice</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254802</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ve been using &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spamihilator.com/&quot;&gt;Spamihilator&lt;/a&gt; which  seems to work okay and is trainable.  Haven&apos;t compared it to anything else, though.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254802</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:38:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>maurice</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: schnee</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254815</link>	
		<description>Another vote for POPfile. It always did a fabulous job blocking unwanted spam for me.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254815</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 16:03:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>schnee</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: LairBob</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254835</link>	
		<description>I use POPFile, too. It&apos;s really great--the only real caveat is that it&apos;s not actually integrated into the client. It&apos;s a separate process that you manage through a browser interface, so it&apos;s a bit more cumbersome than an integrated solution would be.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That being said, all the &quot;integrated&quot; spam-protection options like SpamBayes seem to be Outlook-only, so if you want to stick with OE, it looks like you&apos;re almost certainly going to have to go with some kind of external solution like POPFile, MailWasher, KnowSpam, etc.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254835</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 16:57:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LairBob</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: seanyboy</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254852</link>	
		<description>Ermm. yes. Popfile. &lt;br&gt;
It rocks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254852</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2005 17:58:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>seanyboy</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: madman</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#254973</link>	
		<description>POPFile all the way, baby! I use Eudora and I&apos;ve evaluated a whole lot of desktop spam filters, and POPFile is the only one that&apos;s lasted more than a couple of weeks without annoying the crap out of me. Also, the more you train it, the more delightfully accurate it gets. :)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
A combination of SpamAssasin on the server and POPFile on my desktop keeps the spam safely away.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ah, I see others have voted for it too. Goodie!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(The only downside: It hogs 30-40 MB of RAM)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-254973</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 06:50:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>madman</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: ObscureReferenceMan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/14806/Please-recommend-a-free-spam-filter-for-Outlook-Express#255241</link>	
		<description>I&apos;ll second MailWasher. I use the free version, and it&apos;s easy, unobtrusive, and seems to learn well. There&apos;s also an upgrade that you pay for, but I haven&apos;t tried it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2005:site.14806-255241</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 14:37:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ObscureReferenceMan</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
