<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Immeth idiotus?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/142800/Immeth-idiotus/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Immeth idiotus?</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:01:21 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:01:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Immeth idiotus?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/142800/Immeth-idiotus</link>	
		<description>From Darwin&apos;s autobiography: &apos;Some of these boys were rather clever, but I may add on the principle of &quot;noscitur a socio&quot; that not one of them ever became in the least distinguished.&apos; &lt;em&gt;What does &quot;noscitur a socio&quot; mean in this context?&lt;/em&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; It&apos;s all in the question. My latin is nonexistent, and google searches only suggest the idea of the company you keep, which I don&apos;t quite get here.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2010:site.142800</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 11:50:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bigbopper</dc:creator>
		
			<category>latin</category>
		
			<category>darwin</category>
		
			<category>autobiography</category>
		
			<category>noscitur</category>
		
			<category>resolved</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: flug</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/142800/Immeth-idiotus#2043695</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://books.google.com/books?id=kOxB1FgEajYC&amp;lpg=PT418&amp;ots=SpnrRC1pdI&amp;dq=&apos;Some%20of%20these%20boys%20were%20rather%20clever%2C%20but%20I%20may%20add%20on%20the%20principle%20of%20%22noscitur%20a%20socio%22%20that%20not%20one%20of%20them%20ever%20became%20in%20the%20least%20distinguished.&amp;pg=PT418#v=onepage&amp;q=&apos;Some%20of%20these%20boys%20were%20rather%20clever,%20but%20I%20may%20add%20on%20the%20principle%20of%20%22noscitur%20a%20socio%22%20that%20not%20one%20of%20them%20ever%20became%20in%20the%20least%20distinguished.&amp;f=false&quot;&gt;More context is here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I don&apos;t know anything about Latin per se, but it seems to mean &quot;You may know him by the company he keeps&quot;.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;Him&quot; in this case would most likely mean Darwin himself--getting to the idea the he himself, like his friends, may have been rather clever but didn&apos;t appear headed toward a career of particularly high distinction.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2010:site.142800-2043695</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:01:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flug</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: flug</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/142800/Immeth-idiotus#2043698</link>	
		<description>And I&apos;ll let those with more particular knowledge of the British class system of the time weigh in, but &quot;distinguished&quot; seems to have some class overtones as well--he wasn&apos;t exactly hanging out with the lords &amp;amp; nobles, so to speak, but a distinctly lower class.  Sort of the businessmen &amp;amp; shopkeeper types as opposed to the more distinguished/upper classes.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
He says his classmates fell into that category and &quot;noscitur a socio&quot; (&quot;you know him by the company he keeps&quot;) implies that he, himself, did as well.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2010:site.142800-2043698</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:09:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flug</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: nangar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/142800/Immeth-idiotus#2043720</link>	
		<description>Literally &quot;he&apos;s known by his associate.&quot; But it sounds like it&apos;s equivalent to &quot;it&apos;s not what you know but who you know&quot; here.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2010:site.142800-2043720</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:31:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nangar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: nangar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/142800/Immeth-idiotus#2043722</link>	
		<description>sorry - &lt;i&gt;for&lt;/i&gt; his associate.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2010:site.142800-2043722</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 12:33:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nangar</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: holgate</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/142800/Immeth-idiotus#2043787</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt; &quot;distinguished&quot; seems to have some class overtones as well&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Not quite, because it&apos;s &quot;become... distinguished&quot;, which suggests future achievements over the privileges of birth. However, &quot;distinction&quot; in that context implies achievements that could be measured against the institutional hierarchies of Victorian life: church, academia, politics, commerce. (Also, Darwin was from a comfortably wealthy family of relatively famous heritage.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
So the context is Darwin&apos;s inherent modesty at work: &lt;i&gt;like the company he kept&lt;/i&gt;, Darwin doesn&apos;t consider his life and career to have been particularly distinguished. Another example: &quot;I have a fair share of invention, and of common sense or judgment, such as every fairly successful lawyer or doctor must have, but not, I believe, in any higher degree.&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(The first of the four-part &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/darwin/inourtime.shtml&quot;&gt;In Our Time special on Darwin&lt;/a&gt; discusses his time and peers at Cambridge.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2010:site.142800-2043787</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:51:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: verstegan</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/142800/Immeth-idiotus#2043791</link>	
		<description>Darwin could have written: &apos;I was a clever schoolboy, but there was little to suggest that I would grow up to be a distinguished man.&apos;  However, this would have sounded rather boastful, so instead he makes the point indirectly with reference to his schoolfellows: &apos;A man is known by the company he keeps; and although some of my friends were clever, none of them grew up to be distinguished.&apos;  Then he wraps it up a bit more by putting the proverb into Latin.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The implication of the passage is that Shrewsbury School failed to bring out the talents of its cleverest pupils.  But it&apos;s typical of Darwin that instead of saying so directly, he leaves it to the reader to work out that this is actually a damning indictment of his old school.  (More on Darwin&apos;s schooldays &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shrewsbury.org.uk/index.cfm?fuseaction=features.content&amp;cmid=615&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, if you&apos;re interested.)  As with Darwin&apos;s views on religion, you have to read between the lines.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2010:site.142800-2043791</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:58:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>verstegan</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
