The processor cost of upgrading
December 14, 2009 6:21 AM Subscribe
Upgrading from OS X 10.4 to 10.6: Does it use more CPU?
I have a Mac Mini 1.66GHz that suffers from overheating problems when placed under stress. I'm looking at upgrading for the extra utilities such as Time Machine and Quicktime Pro, but i am concerned that a newer OS may place more pressure on my weakened computer. Does 10.6 run the computer harder than 10.4?
posted by WhackyparseThis to computers & internet (14 answers total)
Load Avg: 0.05, 0.12, 0.09 CPU usage: 1.28% user, 2.57% sys, 96.13% idle
On a computer with half the processor cycles available, maybe it'd be 90% idle doing all this stuff; that's still not enough load to overheat a machine. I suspect a good chunk of that sys time is that OSX is notoriously inefficient at enumerating process information. top itself was probably half the actual load at the time I was looking.
If by "run the computer harder" you mean does the CPU get railed all the time? No. It probably does that less frequently than Tiger did, since it doesn't have quite as many of the funky mdworker/mds bugs that caused huge long-term spikes in processor load during Spotlight indexing (which is what most people perceived as random CPU load for "no reason").
"a newer OS may place more pressure on my weakened computer"
It's not clear to me what this means. If you're concerned about OSX following the historic Microsoft pattern of lower efficiency and performance in subsequent OS releases, you can be relieved that for most tasks on most hardware, newer releases of OSX tend to be faster and not slower. If you mean something else, you might have to explain more clearly.
posted by majick at 6:38 AM on December 14, 2009