Where did that continent go?
October 29, 2009 1:39 AM Subscribe
Is there any technical reason why Antarctica often gets left off world maps?
Best answer: Nobody lives there (except The Thing).
posted by randomstriker at 2:35 AM on October 29, 2009 [4 favorites]
posted by randomstriker at 2:35 AM on October 29, 2009 [4 favorites]
As bluekayk said, I would assume that it has to do with the type and intended use of the map.
UTM, for example, is invalid above 84°N and below 80°S - if you look at the zones in this image, you'll see that a good bit of the interior of Antarctica is outside the standard zones. There is a system intended for use above 84°N and below 80°S, at the poles - UPS, which is not intended for use in world maps (iirc).
...that said, UTM itself isn't all that great for world maps, intended for larger-scale maps (better detail, landmasses look larger, etc).
I'm sure someone else with a better answer will come along shortly :)
posted by neewom at 3:21 AM on October 29, 2009
UTM, for example, is invalid above 84°N and below 80°S - if you look at the zones in this image, you'll see that a good bit of the interior of Antarctica is outside the standard zones. There is a system intended for use above 84°N and below 80°S, at the poles - UPS, which is not intended for use in world maps (iirc).
...that said, UTM itself isn't all that great for world maps, intended for larger-scale maps (better detail, landmasses look larger, etc).
I'm sure someone else with a better answer will come along shortly :)
posted by neewom at 3:21 AM on October 29, 2009
On just about every common projection, it ends up as a long strip at the bottom of the map.
This shows that flat projections of spheres are stupid, so map makers tend to leave it off the map.
A static map cannot show the shape of Antarctica anyway - it changes shape day by day as ice melts and freezes in a cyclic pattern around the year.
posted by w0mbat at 3:33 AM on October 29, 2009
This shows that flat projections of spheres are stupid, so map makers tend to leave it off the map.
A static map cannot show the shape of Antarctica anyway - it changes shape day by day as ice melts and freezes in a cyclic pattern around the year.
posted by w0mbat at 3:33 AM on October 29, 2009
FWIW, Antarctica is perfectly clear on the Fuller Projection - my personal favourite, if a little quirky due to its non-rectangular-ness.
posted by Mwongozi at 4:47 AM on October 29, 2009 [4 favorites]
posted by Mwongozi at 4:47 AM on October 29, 2009 [4 favorites]
It doesn't show up on maps of political boundaries because it lacks any governmental authority (by treaty and the fact that there's only maybe a hundred scientists/engineers there).
posted by cmiller at 5:41 AM on October 29, 2009
posted by cmiller at 5:41 AM on October 29, 2009
« Older Plan My Drive from ATL to Vermont | ¿Es Spanish Cat language school in Australia bueno... Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.
posted by bluejayk at 1:51 AM on October 29, 2009 [1 favorite]