Sioux Falls, SD vs Fargo, ND?
October 16, 2009 8:38 AM   Subscribe

Question: Which city is better - Sioux Falls, SD or Fargo, ND?

Irrelevant.
posted by Jimmie to Travel & Transportation (6 answers total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: i can't tell if this is a stunt or just a really terribly put together question, but either way this isn't going to work. -- cortex

 
Better for what?
posted by sanko at 8:40 AM on October 16, 2009


dude we need way more than that, unless you're looking to get a bunch of upper midwest slamming jokes. I've got plenty if that's the case.
posted by Think_Long at 8:44 AM on October 16, 2009


Sioux Falls has a larger population, so more people must want to live there, ergo it must be better!

(While this is a rather contrived syllogism, the OP didn't give too much other info...)
posted by LSK at 8:48 AM on October 16, 2009


Best answer: I've driven through both. Based on this extensive experience, I say Fargo is better.
posted by gimonca at 8:49 AM on October 16, 2009


Best answer: I've performed intensive inspection of both cities via Google Maps and Wikipedia. Based on this detailed analysis, I say Sioux Falls is better.
posted by TheNewWazoo at 8:55 AM on October 16, 2009 [1 favorite]


Best answer: I have also driven through both, and would say Sioux Falls is better, but mainly because it's not (quite) as isolated as Fargo.
posted by cabingirl at 9:00 AM on October 16, 2009


« Older Does anyone know who might be continuing Marcel...   |   I can't do this job anymore! Newer »
This thread is closed to new comments.