Making a case for telecommuting.
September 21, 2009 9:44 AM
Subscribe
How can I make a strong case for telecommuting? Problem: I don't have the job yet.
I'm currently employed, but I'm looking for new jobs (hence anonymity). I've found a position in New York City for which I'm actually rather well-suited. Problem: I live in the Midwest and I cannot move for three years.
What I have going for me: the job is asking for a somewhat unusual combination of skills in rather particular language. I've got them. I'm well above-average at some of them, but meet all of their requirements and preferred qualifications. The work is largely programming and statistics, which I think are fairly proven areas in which telecommuting can work. I don't live in NYC, so salary goes a bit further for me, if that might be a factor (sorry to undercut you, New Yorkers). I also interviewed with a similar (very well-known; they'll know who I'm talking about) company for a similar role a couple of months ago that was a telecommuting position by default.
Are you an HR specialist/manager/employer? If so, what would make you consider a telecommuter? Are you someone who has successfully argued this case? Let me know how you pulled it off.
Thanks in advance for all your help - I'm excited about this job, anticipate failure, but want to take the best shot I can. Throwaway email: telenewyorker@gmail.com
posted by anonymous to work & money (9 comments total)
1 user marked this as a favorite
One red flag I can think of is tax issues. If they hire you, they'll create nexus in the midwest. If they aren't paying taxes in the midwest now, the cost of compliance will probably be higher than your salary.
One way around this might be to offer to be a contractor rather than an employee. This means paying your own benefits and taxes, so you would take on the extra cost of being in the new state. But it would relieve them of those specific concerns.
posted by politikitty at 9:55 AM on September 21