A friend requires cataract surgery in the near future, and has some questions about his options for MeFites who've pondered the same issues.
(I have seen
this thread and pointed him to it -
juggler, have you had your surgery yet? What did you decide to do?)
My friend is 43. He has been mildly nearsighted since 12 and has worn glasses/contacts for distance vision since then, but has never had problems with very close vision. The cataract in his left eye is quite advanced, the right one less so; he is planning to have both done, but has not chosen his replacement lenses yet.
Single focus lenses: It appears that he could choose to have single focus close-focus lenses in both eyes, or single focus distance-focus lenses. If you have two close-focus lenses, how well can you see small things up close, like tiny iPhone screws or needles to thread? If you have two distance-focus lenses, can you read without glasses and do other close work? Is there a reason to choose one over the other? If you could do it over, would you get the same focal distances?
Multi-focus lenses: What kind of lens did you get? How happy are you with your overall vision? Was it worth the extra expense? He has BCBS insurance and will probably have to pay above the coverage cost to get multi-focal lenses.
Special bonus question: Anyone with the new Crystalens accommodating lens?
TruncatedTiller, you posted that your wife has them - is she still happy? How does it compare to her natural vision?
Thanks, hivemind. If you prefer e-mail, drop me a note at metacatlet @ gmail or MeMail, and I will pass it along.
What I had was the 1st generation lens, and as I understand it, there have been 2 newer generations since, with more accomodation and a larger lens to help with edge glare.
Personally, I am extremely happy. I was going nearly blind before the surgery, and now have 20/20 in one eye, and 20/40 in the other. The slight monovision was not by design, but there are often measurement errors when doing the first eye, and hence my first eye ended up at 20/40.
That said, I am glad it worked out that way, as the accomodation in my first-gen lenses would not be enough to see well (or read) at near vision if they both were 20/20.
Other than that, vision quality is excellent even with the slight monovision. I have some glare from lights at times (but as I said, it appears to be improved in later versions) and I never think about the lenses. It's as if I still had normal eyes, but without the need for glasses or contacts.
Any other questions, feel free to post, and I'll try to answer them.
posted by eas98 at 7:05 AM on August 20, 2009