<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: What takes good photos that takes good photos?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post What takes good photos that takes good photos?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:54:27 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:54:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: What takes good photos that takes good photos?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos</link>	
		<description>Help me find a good-looking (retro?) and affordable camera for a present. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I&apos;m looking to buy a digital camera as a present for someone who is not so much into photography as she is into lovely-looking objects.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Therefore, I&apos;m looking for a retro-styled point-and-shoot camera. It should take decent pictures (I don&apos;t want a novelty toy) but shouldn&apos;t be too complicated to use. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://digital-photography-school.com/olympus-e-p1-digital-pen&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is the most stylish camera I&apos;ve found in my searches, but I don&apos;t think it&apos;s available yet and anyway it&apos;ll probably be beyond my budget. I can afford to spend around &#163;200, maybe slightly more.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:30:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cincinnatus c</dc:creator>
		
			<category>cameras</category>
		
			<category>retro</category>
		
			<category>photography</category>
		
			<category>presents</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: you&apos;re a kitty!</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1797507</link>	
		<description>Definitely stylish, though a bit more expensive:&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?itemdescription=true&amp;itemCount=60&amp;startValue=1&amp;selectedProductColor=&amp;sortby=&amp;id=14199541&amp;parentid=A_MEDIA_CAMERAS&amp;sortProperties=+subCategoryPosition,+product.marketingPriority,-product.startDate&amp;navCount=9&amp;navAction=poppushpush&amp;color=&amp;pushId=A_MEDIA_CAMERAS&amp;popId=APARTMENT_MEDIA&amp;prepushId=&quot;&gt; MINOX Mini Leica&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?itemdescription=true&amp;itemCount=60&amp;startValue=1&amp;selectedProductColor=&amp;sortby=&amp;id=15288616&amp;parentid=A_MEDIA_CAMERAS&amp;sortProperties=+subCategoryPosition,+product.marketingPriority,-product.startDate&amp;navCount=9&amp;navAction=poppushpush&amp;color=&amp;pushId=A_MEDIA_CAMERAS&amp;popId=APARTMENT_MEDIA&amp;prepushId=&quot;&gt;Rolleiflex Mini&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1797507</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:54:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>you&apos;re a kitty!</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: telegraph</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1797542</link>	
		<description>How married are you to the digital part? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://shop.lomography.com/shop/?utm_source=www&amp;utm_medium=banner&amp;utm_campaign=shop_on_top&quot;&gt;Lomography Online Store&lt;/a&gt; has tons of lovely-looking objects that also happen to take unique and wonderful pictures. I received a point and click instant model (like a Polaroid, but not) and a bunch of film as a gift once and it was much appreciated.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1797542</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:29:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>telegraph</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: dersins</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1797548</link>	
		<description>That Minox Mini-Leica is a serious piece of shit. It looks cool in the picture, but in person it looks like (and is) a cheap, shitty plastic piece of garbage with a added advantage of taking truly terrible photos-- grainy, muddy, useless combinations of way fewer pixels than they claim (it&apos;s a 2 MP sensor that reaches the advertised 5MP only through [deeply incompetent] interpolation.)  I can&apos;t imagine the mini-Rollei is any better. I wouldn&apos;t buy that camera for my worst enemy. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
OK, I &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; buy it for my worst enemy, but only so he could feel as angry and disappointed by its overwhelming shittiness as I was.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1797548</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:36:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dersins</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Magnakai</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1797583</link>	
		<description>In terms of industrial design, there isn&apos;t really much out there that&apos;s remotely interesting, especially not in your price range. There were some well-made camera a few years back, but it&apos;s all been tedium street for a while now.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you don&apos;t mind using a film camera, something like a good condition Olympus Trip or Canon Q17 (if you can sort the battery issue) would be a lovely thing to own. I&apos;d stay away from Lomo stuff unless you can source a &lt;em&gt;serious&lt;/em&gt; bargain of an LC-A.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The only modern cameras that have interesting construction are the aforementioned EP-1, possibly one of the Ricohs, perhaps the Panasonic LX-3 and maybe the Canon G10, at a push. And the Leica M8, but let&apos;s not go there.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1797583</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:35:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Magnakai</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: holgate</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1797661</link>	
		<description>Ricoh CX-1, since the GR Digital II is out of your budget. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But you can get some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cameraquest.com/leicacl.htm&quot;&gt;really sweet bits of solid industrial design&lt;/a&gt; if you&apos;re prepared to go with film.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1797661</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:21:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>holgate</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: imjustsaying</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1797682</link>	
		<description>The terms &quot;retro&quot; and &quot;digital&quot; are diametrically opposed when it comes to digital cameras at this particular point in time.  &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That is, unless you want to drop a minimum of around $2500 for a used Leica M8 body plus at least an additional $500 or so for a lens.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In my personal opinion this would be a huge waste of money unless the camera&apos;s appearance was paramount over functionality.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1797682</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:46:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>imjustsaying</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: sully75</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1797844</link>	
		<description>Why don&apos;t you buy her a sweet old film camera on Ebay?  If she&apos;s not that into taking pictures, you can get a beautiful object real cheap...film cameras aren&apos;t worth much.  And they still use film, and you can still get it processed.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Fed cameras are russian copies of Leicas, the best cameras ever made, and are crazy cheap.  And really fun and can actually take great pictures.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1797844</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:59:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sully75</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: carpyful</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1797938</link>	
		<description>As others have pointed out, you won&apos;t be able to find a retro looking digital camera without paying the &quot;hey-this-camera-looks-cool-and-retro&quot; tax associated with it.  If you&apos;re willing to spend the $900, the Olympus Pen you linked to is quite a beaut (I want one!).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If price is a big issue for you, then the Lomography cameras that telegraph linked to are a great choice.  Holgas and Dianas are both really chic looking and take great unique photos.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you do lean more towards Lomography, I&apos;d also suggest looking at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=15988413&amp;cm_mmc=Froogle-_-Mens%2C+Apartment-_--_-SuperHeadz+Blackbird+Camera&quot;&gt;Blackbirds&lt;/a&gt;, which are plastic TLRs that look super cool.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Good luck with your search!  I&apos;d be curious to see what you finally decide on.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1797938</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:46:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>carpyful</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: sully75</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1798082</link>	
		<description>To echo my own post, &lt;a href=&quot;http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-russian-FED-5-rangefinder-camera-IN-BOX-NEW_W0QQitemZ260432579485QQcmdZViewItemQQptZFilm_Cameras?hash=item3ca2fdcb9d&amp;_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&amp;_trkparms=65%3A12|66%3A2|39%3A1|72%3A1234|240%3A1318|301%3A0|293%3A1|294%3A50&quot;&gt;this would be pretty sweet.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1798082</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:30:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sully75</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Lukenlogs</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/125813/What-takes-good-photos-that-takes-good-photos#1804803</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cameraquest.com/retIIa.htm&quot;&gt;Kodak Retina IIa&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
Shoots 35mm film.  I picked one up cleaning out a dusty old closet years ago and shot B&amp;amp;W around San Francisco that weekend and it was awesome!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.125813-1804803</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:03:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lukenlogs</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
