<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: A hand-screenprint feel with digital technology</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/124894/A-handscreenprint-feel-with-digital-technology/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post A hand-screenprint feel with digital technology</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:31:49 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:31:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: A hand-screenprint feel with digital technology</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/124894/A-handscreenprint-feel-with-digital-technology</link>	
		<description>I am looking to get a screenprint look on my graphic design work. What are some techniques or some filters I could use to enhance my Adobe Design Suite environment? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I want to produce some projects that look something like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asmithillustration.com/images/news/weirdholidays.jpg&quot;&gt;these by  artist Andy Smith.&lt;/a&gt; My work just looks too perfect, the edges and colors too precise. Not to mention my typography doesn&apos;t have that custom fit. I know that some of that is only achieved by actually doing it by hand but I doubt that Mr. Smith is making these stickers with a silk screen. Specifically I would like to:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1. Get that transparent, yet vibrant, colors that overlay each other from a screenprinting process.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2. Get system fonts to look a little more hand-lettered. I currently am doing this by laying them down on a slightly crooked path and mixing up angles and sizes a bit.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
3. Get my &quot;ink&quot; to fade out and splotch like silk screening. Perhaps there is a quality filter? I am not opposed to laborious processes as long as it works.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Being a self-taught graphic designer that never has any contact with other graphic designers, I have no one to bounce ideas off of or help me mess with techniques. This is an issue that has been bugging me for a long time.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.124894</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:02:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Foam Pants</dc:creator>
		
			<category>graphicdesign</category>
		
			<category>screenprint</category>
		
			<category>technique</category>
		
			<category>filter</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: Optimus Chyme</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/124894/A-handscreenprint-feel-with-digital-technology#1784322</link>	
		<description>On (3), I just draw over it by hand, change the setting to Multiply or whatever, and half-ass the drawing.  It takes a lot more work to do things imperfectly.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.124894-1784322</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:31:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Optimus Chyme</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: O9scar</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/124894/A-handscreenprint-feel-with-digital-technology#1784749</link>	
		<description>Several tricks come to mind:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1) Find textures that are organic (like &lt;a href=&quot;http://mayang.com/textures/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) and use them to &quot;distress&quot; various elements.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
2) Find some funky brushes and use them on a mask layer (similar to 1, but with more control).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(here are some tutorials that are along these lines: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illustrationclass.com/?p=89&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.illustrationclass.com/?p=68&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
3) Deliberately misregister separate color layers, set them to multiply so colors blend in spots.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
4) Print something out on a laser printer. Crumple it a bunch, scan it back in.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
5) Run something through a copier, then copy that copy, and so on. If you don&apos;t have access to a free/cheap copier, it might work to print something really tiny on an inkjet, scan it and blow it up.&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;br&gt;
6) If you have money to blow, buy some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.misterretro.com/image_filters.html&quot;&gt;Mister Retro filters&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
7) Get some fonts that are different from your overused system fonts. If you want to sell a vintage look most of the basic stuff in your font menu won&apos;t work. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.misprintedtype.com/v3/fonts.php&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; are some freebies that might work for you. I personally wouldn&apos;t do funky paths or sizes because that would look odd/sloppy. To get a more antiqued look you want to treat the edges and texture of your type as a whole. I also believe you should hand-letter something if you want it to look hand-lettered. You can certainly trace an existing font if you don&apos;t feel like totally winging it. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Other must-read tutorials:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cameronmoll.com/archives/000024.html&quot;&gt;That wicked worn look&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://fontfeed.com/archives/tip-the-wornweatheredstamped-look/&quot;&gt;The worn/weathered/stamp look&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One last thing - don&apos;t do everything here at once. That&apos;ll be nuts. You&apos;ll have to play around and see what works.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.124894-1784749</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:43:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>O9scar</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
