Should I fix my LCD TV or replace it? Our 18-month-old LCD TV has died. Tech support says it's probably the "main board." We're outside the warranty period. Repairs (including shipping) will probably run to at least half the cost of simply replacing it.
The TV is an
Olevia 532H; we'd probably replace it with a
Samsung 32".
I'd like your advice on what to do. Here's how I see it:
Pro fixing: Until now, the TV has worked well, and we like it, so if a repair is likely to keep it going for another 5 years or so, that seems worthwhile-- but how long should we expect an LCD TV to last anyway? Repairing is probably cheaper, though it's unclear by how much. I think it's also better for the environment, since we won't be discarding one hunk of plastic and glass for another.
Pro replacing: Prices have come down, so the replacement would be a better-quality, more reliable set (though again, how long should an LCD TV last?). The cost of replacing it is known, whereas we don't know the cost of repairs until we've already spent $150+ sending it in and paying a diagnostic fee. We also get back to a working TV quicker.
What do you think?
Look at this this way... you can buy a used two year old Olevia that's prone to breakage for $150 plus whatever repair costs there will be, or you can spend $550 and get a top of the line new set.
posted by MegoSteve at 4:36 PM on June 15