Diplomacy in absence
April 24, 2009 4:13 AM
Subscribe
When an embassy acts as a proxy, representing the interests of a third country, what kind of compensation is made to them?
The US has asked Sweden to check on the status of
two arrested journalists in North Korea, because the US does not have diplomatic contact there, and the Swiss represented US interests in Cuba for a while. What do countries like Sweden or Switzerland get out of such an arrangement, and is there a formal term for this?
posted by cmonkey to law & government (4 comments total)
I've dealt with such proxy representatives while working in some East African nations that were very, very hostile to the interests of The United States.
It's my understanding these services are offered as a courtesy, not only to the countries involved (the United States and Iran in this case), but also to the broader international community.
What would Switzerland or Sweden get out of it? Influence, global recognition, and they chance to do some good.
After all, while governments may and often do publicly disagree, even to the point of throwing their toys out of the pram, they almost certainly are still speaking to each other. Sometimes these "off the record" conversations take place via formal channels (as detailed above), or they may be more clandestine.
posted by Mutant at 4:35 AM on April 24