I'm ready to start a savings account. Should I start one with ShoreBank, since they have a relatively high APY and seem to be "socially conscious"?
Based on
this post on Get Rich Slowly (which has over 1,200 comments), ShoreBank seems to have the highest APY. But then, that's so volatile given the current crisis that I wonder how much that really means.
I also wonder how accurate all this information is. For instance, I noticed that HSBC was listed as having a certain APY, but then if you went to their website there was fine print about how it was the APY as of some date a couple months ago. That's some pretty misleading airbrushing they're doing on themselves, since the rates have been steadily plummeting. My point being: how do I know ShoreBank (or any bank) isn't using similarly misleading fine print? (I haven't found it very easy to get clear information from ShoreBank's website.)
Most of the comments about ShoreBank in the Get Reach Slowly thread are positive, but
this person makes it sound like the initial process of signing up was a bureaucratic nightmare. Also, everyone seems underwhelmed with the web interface.
Its image as a socially conscious bank is appealing. But
a lot of what they consider socially conscious seems to be investing in "faith-based organizations." My views on religion are similar to those of Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, and Bill Maher, so I don't see investing in churches as a good thing per se. OTOH, (a) if they're specifically investing in church programs that happen do good charity/community work, then that's good, and (b) I obviously don't need to be a huge fan of every single client of the bank I open a savings account with.
It seems like everything about savings accounts on the web includes lots of praise for ING, but their APY is abysmal. That said, I'm completely open to anything.
(I have seen this AskMe question about ShoreBank, but that's outdated since it was back in the old days of early 2008.)
- ALL savings account rates are pretty low. Online "high-yields" are bouncing somewhere between 1.5-3%. Brick and mortar banks are generally next-to-nothing.
- Liquid savings are not great investment vehicles, so the difference between 1.5 and 3% on a relatively small balance is not going to make or break you.
- Savings rates are extremely volatile and not gauranteed. If you pick the highest yield today it may not be the highest yield tomorrow. This was true when savings rates were rising astronomically, and was true when they were tumbling down.
- CDs are good investments for your liquid savings when savings rates are falling, but terrible when they are rising. Make sure your bank offers CDs and act accordingly.
- Savings accounts, in theory, should not be accessed heavily--that's what checking accounts are for--so the feature set of the website shouldn't make much of a difference.
- Shore's 2.8% APY is as of 3/10.
- Rate chasing is not worth the time or effort it takes.
I've found after experimenting with several banks over the past few years that it is much, MUCH easier to deal with as few financial institutions as possible, and in reaction have moved all of my accounts to a local credit union.
I have used ING Direct in the past when they were at the forefront of the high-yield online savings account craze. I've never had any problem with them and their website is pretty robust. They have heavily diversified their offerings to include insurance, checking, investments, and even mortgages. They have since been outpaced by numerous other online banks in terms of just the savings account though. Transfers outside the bank took 2-3 days at the time. Direct deposit was instant.
I have used EmigrantDirect, which had a crappy web interface, and a "bureaucratic nightmare" of a signup process which included filling out an online application so that they could mail you your credentials (and an EmigrantDirect hat; Snuggie book-light, anyone?) There was a several-day lag between deposits and withdrawals between accounts.
I have used HSBC Direct (when I was using HSBC for my regular banking as well, and that made ALL the difference) and also had no problem with them, though HSBC became physically less convenient for my normal banking, when I decided to hit up the credit union. The APY on my credit union savings account is not high, and doesn't even come close to the now-low ING Direct rates, but I have not looked back. Transfers from my HSBC checking to my online savings were instant.
In short--it really doesn't matter much what bank you choose for a savings account. Get one that is FDIC insured, gives you reasonably easy access to your money, and doesn't have fees or restrictions on earning interest. If they happen to have a social agenda that you agree with, knock yourself out.
posted by coryinabox at 6:40 AM on March 27