<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Does Charlie Rose own a television studio?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/116115/Does-Charlie-Rose-own-a-television-studio/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Does Charlie Rose own a television studio?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:10:31 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:10:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Does Charlie Rose own a television studio?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/116115/Does-Charlie-Rose-own-a-television-studio</link>	
		<description>&quot;From our studio in New York, this is Charlie Rose&quot; ---- who does the &quot;our studio&quot; refer to?  Wikipedia and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.charlierose.com/about/show/&quot;&gt;Official Charlie Rose website&lt;/a&gt; don&apos;t appear to shed any light.  Does Charlie and his co-executive producer own the studio? WNET? Bueller?  Bonus question:  why is it announced that way, other than to stick in the mind of the listener?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.116115</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 22:52:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Napoleonic Terrier</dc:creator>
		
			<category>Charlie</category>
		
			<category>Rose</category>
		
			<category>resolved</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: radicarian</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/116115/Does-Charlie-Rose-own-a-television-studio#1665296</link>	
		<description>The Charlie Rose show is filmed in the Bloomberg headquarters in NYC at 59th and Lexington&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
From &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Rose&quot;&gt;wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;: In 1994, Rose moved the show to a studio owned by Bloomberg Television, which allowed for improved satellite interviewing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.116115-1665296</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:10:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>radicarian</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Napoleonic Terrier</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/116115/Does-Charlie-Rose-own-a-television-studio#1665299</link>	
		<description>D&apos;oh. Thanks!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.116115-1665299</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:12:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Napoleonic Terrier</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: HeroZero</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/116115/Does-Charlie-Rose-own-a-television-studio#1665343</link>	
		<description>Perhaps off-topic, but not sure where else I&apos;d share this: I worked as a temp researcher for Charlie Rose for a week back around 2003. The Bloomberg HQ is an odd place in how it combines office space with television studio space. It&apos;s not like, say, the hallways of the NBC studios like you see on 30 Rock, with the office spaces and studio spaces distinctly separated. The cubicle farm and Charlie&apos;s weird little black chamber are right on top of one another. In his office, Charlie has mugs from all the different news shows he&apos;s worked on and, for some reason, a pair of sneakers emblazoned with the logo for Snoop Dog vehicle&lt;em&gt; The Wash&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.116115-1665343</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 03:47:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HeroZero</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Thorzdad</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/116115/Does-Charlie-Rose-own-a-television-studio#1665355</link>	
		<description>Fwiw, the opening announcement used to say &quot;From the Bloomberg studios in mid-town Manhattan...&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I&apos;ve always assumed they dropped the overt reference to Bloomberg once he (Bloomberg) became a more active politician. Charlie must, at least, &lt;em&gt;maintain&lt;/em&gt; the appearance of impartiality, y&apos;know.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.116115-1665355</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:49:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thorzdad</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: gjc</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/116115/Does-Charlie-Rose-own-a-television-studio#1665499</link>	
		<description>When I hear broadcasters using that construction, I just assume the announcer is using the royal &quot;our&quot;, meaning the studio that the show uses, not the announcer&apos;s personally owned studio.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&quot;From our studios in downtown Des Moines, here&apos;s Dance Party USA!&quot;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is just a nicer way to say &quot;Broadcasting from an office building in Des Moines, we now present our program!&quot;  With the added connotation that the studio is dedicated to the production of that show.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I always assumed that they make mention of the studio at all to give context to the broadcast.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.116115-1665499</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 10:37:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gjc</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
