<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Why is this motion picture created for purposes of copyright law in the United Kingdom?</title>
	<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/115287/Why-is-this-motion-picture-created-for-purposes-of-copyright-law-in-the-United-Kingdom/</link>
	<description>Comments on Ask MetaFilter post Why is this motion picture created for purposes of copyright law in the United Kingdom?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:28:44 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:28:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Question: Why is this motion picture created for purposes of copyright law in the United Kingdom?</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/115287/Why-is-this-motion-picture-created-for-purposes-of-copyright-law-in-the-United-Kingdom</link>	
		<description>Why do movie credits always contain the line &quot;This motion picture was created by &amp;lt;company&amp;gt; for purposes of copyright law in the United Kingdom&quot;?&lt;/company&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; I live in the UK so it took me a long time to realise that we didn&apos;t get special versions of the credits containing this line. USA credits have the line too. What&apos;s special about the UK that requires this line?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.115287</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:01:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mwongozi</dc:creator>
		
			<category>movie</category>
		
			<category>credits</category>
		
			<category>uk</category>
		
			<category>copyright</category>
		
			<category>law</category>
		
	</item> <item>
		<title>By: turgid dahlia</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/115287/Why-is-this-motion-picture-created-for-purposes-of-copyright-law-in-the-United-Kingdom#1654899</link>	
		<description>Perhaps some of the music has changed, due to the vagaries of copyright law and licensing and so forth.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.115287-1654899</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:28:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>turgid dahlia</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: Mwongozi</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/115287/Why-is-this-motion-picture-created-for-purposes-of-copyright-law-in-the-United-Kingdom#1654917</link>	
		<description>Except that you see this line even when watching American movies in American theatres.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.115287-1654917</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:42:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mwongozi</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: brianogilvie</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/115287/Why-is-this-motion-picture-created-for-purposes-of-copyright-law-in-the-United-Kingdom#1654958</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m not an expert, but UK copyright law recognizes a &quot;moral right&quot; of a creator to be designated the author of a book, film, video, etc.; my presumption is that the statement is intended to ensure that the production company, rather than the director/screenwriter/whatever, is legally the creator and holds any moral rights.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.115287-1654958</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:19:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brianogilvie</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: rkent</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/115287/Why-is-this-motion-picture-created-for-purposes-of-copyright-law-in-the-United-Kingdom#1655163</link>	
		<description>Probably something to do with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_for_hire&quot;&gt;Work for hire&lt;/a&gt; doctrine.  That doesn&apos;t distinguish it from US law per se, but maybe the UK has some kind of notice provision that requires it to be placed in the credits.  Maybe it&apos;s just a convention.  I am not a UK intellectual property lawyer.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.115287-1655163</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:14:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rkent</dc:creator>
	</item><item>
		<title>By: joeclark</title>
		<link>http://ask.metafilter.com/115287/Why-is-this-motion-picture-created-for-purposes-of-copyright-law-in-the-United-Kingdom#1660368</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s for assertion of moral right or droit moral, which does not exist in U.S. law.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:ask.metafilter.com,2009:site.115287-1660368</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:51:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
