We are writing to inform you that we recently discovered that you are among a group of individuals whose personally identifiable information, such as name and social security number, were inadvertently exposed to third parties. We regret this incident and have no reason to believe that your personal information has or will be shared with others; nonetheless, as a precaution, we are notifying you of this situation.And yes, I do understand that "nothing is likely to happen" and such. And that only non-profit organizations received them. But, you know, actual people work at non-profits, too. People are far from perfect. Anyone who actually still has these names/numbers could easily call the organization asking about the leak (it lists a number to call with any questions, it's merely the organizations public phone number) and figure out "I just have to wait a year."
In this particular instance, your name and social security number were on a document that was inadvertently attached to an email transmitted to several non-commercial third-party recipients.
When this was discovered, the xxxxxxx Scholarship Program, LLC took immediate action to notify the recipients to destroy the document.
Recognizing the seriousness of this incident and the concern we share for the personal security of our applicants, we have made arrangements to provide you with *a free year of identity protection* (their emphasis) with TrustedID. TrustedID will help you proactively protect your identity by placing fraud flags on your credit reports, which will ensure that no new credit is opened in your name without your consent, and provide you with a copy of your free annual credit report. The TrustedID service is backed by a $1,000,000 limited service warranty, so in the unlikely even that anything may happen, you are covered.
Sincerely,
There are three requirements for Article III standing: (1) injury in fact, which means an invasion of a legally protected interest that is (a) concrete and particularized, and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical; (2) a causal relationship between the injury and the challenged conduct, which means that the injury fairly can be traced to the challenged action of the defendant, and has not resulted from the independent action of some third party not before the court; and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision, which means that the prospect of obtaining relief from the injury as a result of a favorable ruling is not too speculative.So you can sue but only after you can prove that you've suffered ill effects from identity theft. "I might be a victim of identity theft someday, maybe" isn't sufficient grounds for suit.
You are not logged in, either login or create an account to post comments
You might get more satisfaction and the same effect from building a big money bonfire in your yard, though. Bonfires are rather pretty whereas lawsuits tend to be ugly.
Call them up and ask for...two years of identity theft protection. Or a pony. Or whatever it is you want because it is totally unclear what you think they should be doing for you.
posted by phoenixy at 6:21 PM on February 19